Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Without field inoculum, nodulation was spotty relative to inoculated fields.

A claim from PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SMALL FABA BEANS GROWN IN MANITOBA · 1975

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without field inoculum, nodulation was spotty relative to inoculated fields.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae0
Treatment
no inoculume0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Comparator
fields where inoculum was appliede0
Setting
Manitobae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where no inoculum was applied to farmers’ fields in Manitoba, nodulation of faba beans was spotty, plant nitrogen was lower, and ethylene production was less than with plants from fields where inoculum was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–635

Title

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SMALL FABA BEANS GROWN IN MANITOBA

E. CANDLISH; K. W. CLARK Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1975. doi:10.4141/cjps75-012

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-c2bca3bd1b9c8d9096c91124817e3c504c7eb1051aa3c008b437dd93b9a1481a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

inoculation · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

49 papers: 41 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.