Abstract
The present work was carried out on faba bean and wheat g:ops growing in sandy loam highly calcareous soil and sandy soil at West Nubaria region during the Winter seasons of 200012001 and 200112002, to study the effect of interactions between mycorrhizal rung; (AM), phosphate dissolving bacteria (PO B) and Rhizobium ieguminosarum biovar viceae (R) or Azotobac/ar chroococum (A) on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by faba bean and wheat plants. The experiments were lied out in a split-plot design with four replications. The main plots were for minera fertilizers (two levels) and sub-plots were for inoculation treatments (eight inoculation treatments). The results dearly showed that Inoculation with Rhizobium feguminosarum or Azotobacter chroococum singly or in combination with AM or poe and (AM + POS) markedly enhanced the yield and all the measured yield components of faba bean and wheat plants, as well as nutrients uptake by plants under calcareous and sandy soil conditions compared to uninoculaled or inoculated plants by AM and poe alone or the dual inoculation with (AM + POe). Nodulation of faba bean plants was positively affected by inoculation with Rhizobium andlor any other inocula mixed with Rhizobium. Faba bean and wheal dry weight was increased by abOut 25% due to inoculation with mixtures of AM + R + poe or AM + A + POB as compared 10 uninoculated plants or any other inoculation treatment. Nitrogen uptake by inoculated faba bean and wheat plants 'th Rhizobium and Azotobacter andlor their mixture with AM and poe was increas,d by 3.97 and 6.38%, with relative increase in seed yield by 11.28 and 3.72% as compared to uninoculated or inoculated plants with AM or poe and (AM + POe) for calcareous soil, respectively. While, It was increased by 8.95 and 44.1% with relative increase in seed yield by 16.42 and 6.85% for sandy soil. Inoculation with mycorrhiza or phosphate dissolving bacteria singly and with any of their combinations increased R-supply which led to Improve P-uptake by faba bean and wheat plants as compared to uninoculated or inoculated plants with Rhizobium and Azotobacter, it was Increased by 1.91 and 3.57% for calcareous soil and by 2.28 and 1.94% for sandy soli, respectively. In general, a highly response of faba bean or wheat plants to the inoculation mixed was observed to be higher than that for single Inoculation for the ~o tested soil types. This indicated that there was a positive interaction between he two andlor three inocula for the welfare of faba bean and wheat plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
faba bean inoculation enhanced yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with Rhizobium feguminosarum or Azotobacter chroococume0
- Interactor
- Rhizobium feguminosarume0symbiont
- Outcome
- yield and all the measured yield componentse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with Rhizobium feguminosarum or Azotobacter chroococum singly or in combination with AM or poe and (AM + POS) markedly enhanced the yield and all the measured yield components of faba bean and wheat plants”
Claim · model-written summary
wheat inoculation enhanced yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with Rhizobium feguminosarum or Azotobacter chroococume0
- Interactor
- Rhizobium feguminosarume0symbiont
- Outcome
- yield and all the measured yield componentse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with Rhizobium feguminosarum or Azotobacter chroococum singly or in combination with AM or poe and (AM + POS) markedly enhanced the yield and all the measured yield components of faba bean and wheat plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation increased faba bean nodulation.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- Nodulatione0
- Direction
- positively affectede0
RhizobiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nodulation of faba bean plants was positively affected by inoculation with Rhizobium andlor any other inocula mixed with Rhizobium.”
Claim · model-written summary
Faba bean dry weight increased about 25% after mixed inoculation.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- inoculation with mixtures of AM + R + poe or AM + A + POBe0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 25%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated plants or any other inoculation treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Faba bean and wheal dry weight was increased by abOut 25% due to inoculation with mixtures of AM + R + poe or AM + A + POB as compared 10 uninoculated plants or any other inoculation treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
wheal dry weight increased about 25% after mixed inoculation.
Verbatim
e0“Faba bean and wheal dry weight was increased by abOut 25% due to inoculation with mixtures of AM + R + poe or AM + A + POB as compared 10 uninoculated plants or any other inoculation treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed inoculation raised faba bean nitrogen uptake 3.97% in calcareous soil.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- inoculatede0
- Outcome
- Nitrogen uptakee0
Not reportedComparatorDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen uptake by inoculated faba bean and wheat plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial mixtures improved plant phosphorus uptake.
- Taxon
- faba bean and wheatVicia fabaTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with mycorrhiza or phosphate dissolving bacteriae0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- P-uptakee0
- Direction
- Improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with mycorrhiza or phosphate dissolving bacteria singly and with any of their combinations increased R-supply which led to Improve P-uptake by faba bean and wheat plants”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Azotobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →Rhizobium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Azotobacter · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
18 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →inoculation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.