Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly affect shoot length, tiller number, or 100 seed weight.

A claim from Effectiveness of native Rhizobium on nodulation and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in Eastern Ethiopia · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly affect shoot length, tiller number, or 100 seed weight.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
shoot length, number of tiller per plant and 100 seed weighte0
Direction
non-significant effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-significant effect of Rhizobium inoculation on shoot length, number of tiller per plant and 100 seed weight in all cropping season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–680
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70

Title

Effectiveness of native Rhizobium on nodulation and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in Eastern Ethiopia

Anteneh Argaw; Abere Mnalku Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2017. doi:10.1080/03650340.2017.1287353

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-4df85f636a87e7eb7276b24a380207376ef54c78e5aa505d719f55b9a7cc67a7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

98 papers: 88 positive, 10 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.