Paper · 2017 · Photosynthetica

Induction of water deficit tolerance in wheat due to exogenous application of plant growth regulators: membrane stability, water relations and photosynthesis

S. K. Dwivedi; A. Arora; V. P. Singh; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
53
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Our experiment was carried out in order to explore effects of plant growth regulators (PGR; thidiazuron, paclobutrazol, and ascorbic acid) on physiological traits of wheat genotypes under water surplus and deficit conditions. Study revealed that relative water content, membrane stability index, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate (PN), and maximal quantum yield of PSII improved with PGRs application across the genotypes both under irrigation and water stress. The response of HD 2733 genotype was more positive toward PGRs treatment as compared to other genotypes under water stress. Higher PN and chlorophyll contents were observed in HD 2987 followed by C 306 genotype under water-stress conditions. Moreover, Rubisco small subunit (SSU) expression was lower in wheat genotypes under water stress as compared to irrigated conditions. Application of PGRs led to upregulation of SSU under water stress, while no significant change was found in Rubisco level and activity under irrigated condition in dependence on PGRs treatments. Yield-related traits showed also significant reduction under water-stress conditions, while application of PGRs enhanced the yield and its components. Results indicated that the PGRs exhibited a positive interaction and synergetic effect on water stressed wheat plants in terms of photosynthetic machinery and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators improved water content, membrane stability and chlorophyll content under irrigation and water stress.

Treatment
PGRs applicatione0
Outcome
relative water content, membrane stability index, chlorophyll contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content, membrane stability index, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate (PN), and maximal quantum yield of PSII improved with PGRs application across the genotypes both under irrigation and water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators improved photosynthetic rate and maximum PSII quantum yield.

Treatment
PGRs applicatione0
Outcome
photosynthetic rate (PN), and maximal quantum yield of PSIIe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content, membrane stability index, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate (PN), and maximal quantum yield of PSII improved with PGRs application across the genotypes both under irrigation and water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2733 responded more positively to regulators than other genotypes under water stress.

Material
HD 2733e0
Treatment
PGRs treatmente0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
more positivee0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of HD 2733 genotype was more positive toward PGRs treatment as compared to other genotypes under water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HD 2987 had higher photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content under water stress, followed by C 306.

Material
HD 2987e0
Outcome
PN and chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
C 306e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher PN and chlorophyll contents were observed in HD 2987 followed by C 306 genotype under water-stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress lowered Rubisco small subunit expression relative to irrigation.

Treatment
water stresse0
Gene
Rubisco small subunit (SSU)e0
Outcome
Rubisco small subunit (SSU) expressione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
irrigated conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rubisco small subunit (SSU) expression was lower in wheat genotypes under water stress as compared to irrigated conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulator application upregulated SSU under water stress.

Treatment
PGRse0
Gene
SSUe0
Outcome
upregulation of SSUe0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of PGRs led to upregulation of SSU under water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulator treatments caused no significant change in Rubisco level or activity under irrigation.

Treatment
PGRs treatmentse0
Outcome
Rubisco level and activitye0
Direction
no significant changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant change was found in Rubisco level and activity under irrigated condition in dependence on PGRs treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced yield-related traits.

Treatment
water-stress conditionse0
Outcome
Yield-related traitse0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield-related traits showed also significant reduction under water-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulator application enhanced yield and yield components.

Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of PGRs enhanced the yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑

class · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

class · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 100 positive, 17 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

class · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

class · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.