Paper · 2019 · Planta Daninha

Pre-Harvest Desiccation in Productivity and Physiological Quality of Cowpea Seeds

M.O. ASSIS; E.F. ARAUJO; F.C.L. FREITAS; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Pre-harvest desiccation is an important strategy to anticipate harvesting, preventing the seed from being left in the field in unfavorable climatic conditions. However, little is known about the use of desiccants and their application times on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of desiccant application at different seasons and of desiccant herbicides on productivity and physiological quality of cowpea seeds. Five dessicants were evaluated: paraquat, paraquat sequential application, glufosinate- ammonium, glyphosate with sequential application of paraquat and paraquat + diuron mixture applied in four seasons: 50% of the pods with green coloration and with seeds formed (season I); 70% of the pods in the purple coloration (season II), 90% of the pods in the coloration brown (season III) and 100% of the pods in the coloration brown (season IV), plus a control without the application of desiccants, in which harvesting was performed when 100% of the pods were brown. The number of days of anticipation of harvest, productivity, uniformity test, mass of one hundred seeds, germination and vigor of the seeds were evaluated. None of desiccation strategies affect the physiological seed quality, independent of the application season. The desquaments paraquat, glufosinate-ammonium and the paraquat+diuron mixture, when applied in seasons I and II, provided anticipation of the harvest in up to 13 days and 9 days, respectively, however, the size of the seeds and consequently the productivity were affected.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desiccation strategies did not affect physiological seed quality across application seasons.

Treatment
desiccation strategiese0
Outcome
physiological seed qualitye0
Direction
Nonee0
Qualifier
independent of the application seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“None of desiccation strategies affect the physiological seed quality, independent of the application season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat applied in seasons I and II advanced harvest by up to 13 and 9 days, respectively.

Treatment
paraquate0
Outcome
anticipation of the harveste0
Direction
anticipatione0
Value
13 days and 9 dayse0
Qualifier
seasons I and IIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“paraquat, glufosinate-ammonium and the paraquat+diuron mixture, when applied in seasons I and II, provided anticipation of the harvest in up to 13 days and 9 days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate-ammonium applied in seasons I and II advanced harvest by up to 13 and 9 days, respectively.

Treatment
glufosinate-ammoniume0
Outcome
anticipation of the harveste0
Direction
anticipatione0
Value
13 days and 9 dayse0
Qualifier
seasons I and IIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“paraquat, glufosinate-ammonium and the paraquat+diuron mixture, when applied in seasons I and II, provided anticipation of the harvest in up to 13 days and 9 days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat plus diuron applied in seasons I and II advanced harvest by up to 13 and 9 days, respectively.

Treatment
paraquat+diuron mixturee0
Outcome
anticipation of the harveste0
Direction
anticipatione0
Value
13 days and 9 dayse0
Qualifier
seasons I and IIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“paraquat, glufosinate-ammonium and the paraquat+diuron mixture, when applied in seasons I and II, provided anticipation of the harvest in up to 13 days and 9 days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early desiccation affected seed size.

Treatment
seasons I and IIe0
Outcome
size of the seedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“when applied in seasons I and II, provided anticipation of the harvest in up to 13 days and 9 days, respectively, however, the size of the seeds and consequently the productivity were affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early desiccation affected productivity.

Treatment
seasons I and IIe0
Outcome
productivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“when applied in seasons I and II, provided anticipation of the harvest in up to 13 days and 9 days, respectively, however, the size of the seeds and consequently the productivity were affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1570 · show in text ↑

paraquat · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.