Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) occupied the third place mainly cereal/ fodder produce in the world. Maize gained a chief place in the many cropping pattern of Pakistan. Intercropping is economically beneficial and favorable for the fertility restoration of land. Intercropping of maize with mungbean increased water use efficiency, light use efficiency as well as nutrient use efficiency which positively affect the different yield as well as agronomic parameters like plant height, number of grain row per cob, cobs length, cob girth, thousand grain weight, total dry matter and seed yield which ultimately increases the final yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping maize with mungbean increased water, light and nutrient use efficiency.
- Treatment
- Intercropping of maize with mungbeane0
- Outcome
- water use efficiency, light use efficiency as well as nutrient use efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping of maize with mungbean increased water use efficiency, light use efficiency as well as nutrient use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping maize with mungbean increased plant height, grain rows per cob and cob length.
- Treatment
- Intercropping of maize with mungbeane0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of grain row per cob, cobs lengthe0
- Direction
- positively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping of maize with mungbean increased water use efficiency, light use efficiency as well as nutrient use efficiency which positively affect the different yield as well as agronomic parameters like plant height, number of grain row per cob, cobs length, cob girth, thousand grain weight, total dry matter and seed yield which ultimately increases the final yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping maize with mungbean positively affected cob girth, thousand grain weight and dry matter.
- Treatment
- Intercropping of maize with mungbeane0
- Outcome
- cob girth, thousand grain weight, total dry mattere0
- Direction
- positively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping of maize with mungbean increased water use efficiency, light use efficiency as well as nutrient use efficiency which positively affect the different yield as well as agronomic parameters like plant height, number of grain row per cob, cobs length, cob girth, thousand grain weight, total dry matter and seed yield which ultimately increases the final yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping maize with mungbean increased seed and final yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping of maize with mungbean increased water use efficiency, light use efficiency as well as nutrient use efficiency which positively affect the different yield as well as agronomic parameters like plant height, number of grain row per cob, cobs length, cob girth, thousand grain weight, total dry matter and seed yield which ultimately increases the final yield.”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna radiata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Vigna radiata · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
830 papers more in this group
See all 834 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.