Paper · 2017 · Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

Effect of liming on micronutrient availability to soybean grown in soil under different lengths of time under no tillage

Silvino Guimarães Moreira; Luís Ignácio Prochnow; Volnei Pauletti; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of liming on the availability of micronutrients to soybean cultivated during different numbers of years under no tillage (NT) was investigated. The treatments consisted of the number of years under NT (three, six, and nine years) and five rates of lime (0, 33, 67 and 100% of the amount calculated to raise soil base saturation to 70%) broadcast on soil surface plus the rate of 100% broadcast with incorporation in the 0-0.20 m layer of a clayey Red Oxisol. Soil and leaf samples were collected at two vegetative stages of the crop (vegetative V4 and blossoming R2). The soil was sampled at depths of 0-0.05, 0.05-0.10, 0.10-0.20, and 0.20-0.30 m. Surface liming had little effect on extractable soil micronutrient and nutrient concentrations in soybean leaves. In the area with three years under NT, all liming rates decreased the extractable soil Zn up to a depth of 0.20 m. Lime incorporation decreased the extractable soil Mn in the surface layer. There were no differences in the extractable soil micronutrients and nutrient concentrations in soybean leaves as a function of the number of years under NT. These data suggest that broadcasting lime at current rates on soils under NT does not necessarily lead to micronutrient deficiencies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface liming had little effect on extractable soil micronutrients and soybean leaf nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Surface liminge0
Outcome
extractable soil micronutrient and nutrient concentrations in soybean leavese0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Surface liming had little effect on extractable soil micronutrient and nutrient concentrations in soybean leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All lime rates decreased extractable soil Zn to 0.20 m after three years of no tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
all liming ratese0
Outcome
extractable soil Zne0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
three years under NTe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the area with three years under NT, all liming rates decreased the extractable soil Zn up to a depth of 0.20 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime incorporation decreased extractable soil Mn in the surface layer.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Lime incorporatione0
Outcome
extractable soil Mne0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
surface layere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lime incorporation decreased the extractable soil Mn in the surface layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage duration did not differ in extractable soil micronutrients or soybean leaf nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
number of years under NTe0
Outcome
extractable soil micronutrients and nutrient concentrations in soybean leavese0
Direction
no differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no differences in the extractable soil micronutrients and nutrient concentrations in soybean leaves as a function of the number of years under NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1120 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that current-rate surface liming under no tillage does not necessarily cause micronutrient deficiencies.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
broadcasting lime at current rates on soils under NT does not necessarily lead to micronutrient deficienciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broadcasting lime at current rates on soils under NT does not necessarily lead to micronutrient deficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–57 · show in text ↑

lime · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.