Paper · 2015 · Acta Horticulturae

DEVELOPING REGENERATION SYSTEM FOR CRYOPRESERVATION IN SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM L.)

K. Distabanjong; C. Distabanjong; S.-W. Jang

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A regeneration system for cryopreservation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), commercial cultivar ‘U-Thong 5’, has been established. Somatic embryogenesis has been done using immature inflorescence segments as explants. The highest induction percentage of the initial embryogenic callus was obtained in Murashige and Skoog media supplemented with 10-15 µM 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid, 50 ml/L coconut water, 500 mg/L casein hydrolysate, and 6% (w/v) sucrose in dark condition. Embryogenic callus developed to somatic embryos and plantlets on MS media containing 50 ml/L coconut water, 0.5 gm/L orchid fertilizer (21-21-21) and 6% (w/v) sucrose. Shoots were able to root on these media. For cryopreservation, a vitrification protocol using different plant vitrification solutions was employed, PVS2, PVS3, and variants of PVS3 (various concentrations of glycerol and sucrose). Somatic embryos in the early stages have been precultured on MS media containing 50 ml/L coconut water, 2 µM abscisic acid, 0.3 M sucrose for 24 h. After 24 h, the somatic embryos have been cultured on the same media with 0.5 M for 24 h. Subsequently, the somatic embryos have been treated with loading solution comprising of 0.5 M sucrose and 2 M glycerol in MS media for 30 min. Then, somatic embryos were dehydrated with different types of PVSs for 30 min at 5°C prior to being immersed in liquid nitrogen for 7 days. After freezing in liquid nitrogen, regeneration percentages of the somatic embryos treated with PVS3 and variants of PVS3 were 34-42%. In contrast using PVS 2 during dehydration step, lower survival and regeneration percentages of the somatic embryos were obtained, when compared to those of PVS3.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified medium gave the highest initial embryogenic callus induction.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Murashige and Skoog media supplemented with 10-15 µM 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid, 50 ml/L coconut water, 500 mg/L casein hydrolysate, and 6% (w/v) sucrosee0
Outcome
induction percentage of the initial embryogenic calluse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest induction percentage of the initial embryogenic callus was obtained in Murashige and Skoog media supplemented with 10-15 µM 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid, 50 ml/L coconut water, 500 mg/L casein hydrolysate, and 6% (w/v) sucrose in dark condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryogenic callus formed embryos and plantlets on supplemented MS medium.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
MS media containing 50 ml/L coconut water, 0.5 gm/L orchid fertilizer (21-21-21) and 6% (w/v) sucrosee0
Outcome
developed to somatic embryos and plantletse0

Verbatim

e0

“Embryogenic callus developed to somatic embryos and plantlets on MS media containing 50 ml/L coconut water, 0.5 gm/L orchid fertilizer (21-21-21) and 6% (w/v) sucrose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots rooted on the same media.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Shoots were able to roote0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots were able to root on these media.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PVS3 and its variants gave 34-42% regeneration after freezing.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
PVS3 and variants of PVS3e0
Outcome
regeneration percentages of the somatic embryose0
Value
34-42%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“After freezing in liquid nitrogen, regeneration percentages of the somatic embryos treated with PVS3 and variants of PVS3 were 34-42%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PVS2 produced lower survival and regeneration than PVS3.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
PVS 2e0
Outcome
survival and regeneration percentages of the somatic embryose0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
PVS3e0

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast using PVS 2 during dehydration step, lower survival and regeneration percentages of the somatic embryos were obtained, when compared to those of PVS3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM OFFICINARUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–91 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

in vitro · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 59 positive, 8 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.