Paper · 2016 · International Annals of Science

Effect of Biochar Application and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Root Colonization and Soil Chemical Properties

Sunusi Abdu Yusif; Michael Olajire Dare

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out in 2013 and 2014 to investigate the effects of biochar application and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) inoculation on AM root colonization and selected soil chemical properties of two tomato genotypes. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot arrangement with two tomato genotypes in the main plots, five rates of biochar applied in the sub plots and two levels of AMF inoculation in the sub-sub plots. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and significant means separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (P<0.05). The results indicated that mycorrhizal inoculation had little or no influence on AM root colonization, soil organic carbon, soil pH and available phosphorus. Application of 20 t ha-1 of biochar significantly increased (P< 0.05) soil pH and available P compared with the control while 10 t ha-1 and 15 t ha-1 of biochar produced higher organic carbon than other rates. In conclusion, biochar increased soil pH but was not high enough as to have detrimental effect on soil properties. It is, therefore, recommended that biochar with very strongly alkaline pH should only be used in soil with low pH for improvement of soil chemical and AM root colonization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation had little or no effect on root colonization and soil chemistry.

Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
AM root colonization, soil organic carbon, soil pH and available phosphoruse0
Direction
little or no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizal inoculation had little or no influence on AM root colonization, soil organic carbon, soil pH and available phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“soil chemical properties of two tomato genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

20 t ha-1 biochar raised soil pH and available P.

Treatment
20 t ha-1 of biochare0
Outcome
soil pH and available Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 20 t ha-1 of biochar significantly increased (P< 0.05) soil pH and available P compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“soil chemical properties of two tomato genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 t ha-1 biochar produced higher soil organic carbon.

Treatment
10 t ha-1e0
Outcome
organic carbone0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 t ha-1 and 15 t ha-1 of biochar produced higher organic carbon than other rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“soil chemical properties of two tomato genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15 t ha-1 biochar produced higher soil organic carbon.

Treatment
15 t ha-1 of biochare0
Outcome
organic carbone0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 t ha-1 and 15 t ha-1 of biochar produced higher organic carbon than other rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“soil chemical properties of two tomato genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–230 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend highly alkaline biochar only for low-pH soil.

Outcome
biochar with very strongly alkaline pH should only be used in soil with low pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar with very strongly alkaline pH should only be used in soil with low pH for improvement of soil chemical and AM root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“soil chemical properties of two tomato genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–230 · show in text ↑

biochar · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 136 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.