Abstract
The aim of study was to know the effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungi (AMF), Glomus mosseae on the growth of onion Allium cepa L. on red-yellow podzolic soils. Completely Randomized Design (CRD) factorial with 10 replicates was used in this experiment. The first factor was mycorrhizae, with two level: without inoculation as a control (M0); 10 gram inoculation = M1). The second factorwas leaf litter of gamal Gliricidia sepium L. species wich were no litter as S0; 5 gram litter = S1; S2 was 10 gram of litter; and 20 grams of loitter in one kilogram of soil separately. Parameters used in this study were the growth of onion that has infected root in percent, and Relative Growth Rate (RGR). ANOVA was used to analyze the data, and followed with DMRT at 95% level test. The result showed that mycorrhizal inoculation increased root and shoot fresh weight, the dry weight of shoot; and the percentage of root infection on the onion. While the leaf litter of gamal increased only in leaf area. In contrast mycorrhizal inoculation and gamal leaf litter and their combination had no effect on other growth parameters. Key words: AMF, Glomus mosseae, Gliricidia sepium, Allium cepa.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation increased onion root and shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weight.
- Taxon
- onion Allium cepa L.
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Glomus mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee2symbiont - Outcome
- root and shoot fresh weight, the dry weight of shoote0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mycorrhizal inoculation increased root and shoot fresh weight, the dry weight of shoot”
e1“onion Allium cepa L.”
e2“Fungi (AMF), Glomus mosseae”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation increased onion root infection percentage.
- Taxon
- onion Allium cepa L.Allium cepae1
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee2symbiont
- Outcome
- percentage of root infectione0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mycorrhizal inoculation increased root and shoot fresh weight, the dry weight of shoot; and the percentage of root infection on the onion”
e1“onion Allium cepa L.”
e2“Fungi (AMF), Glomus mosseae”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamal leaf litter increased onion leaf area.
- Taxon
- onion Allium cepa L.Allium cepae1
- Treatment
- leaf litter of gamale0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the leaf litter of gamal increased only in leaf area”
e1“onion Allium cepa L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation and gamal leaf litter, alone and combined, did not affect other growth parameters.
- Taxon
- onion Allium cepa L.Allium cepae1
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculation and gamal leaf litter and their combinatione0
- Outcome
- other growth parameterse0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mycorrhizal inoculation and gamal leaf litter and their combination had no effect on other growth parameters”
e1“onion Allium cepa L.”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →mycorrhiza · Funneliformis mosseae · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · Funneliformis mosseae · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.