Paper · 2003 · Acta Horticulturae

SCREENING VITIS SPECIES FOR USE IN BREEDING MAGNESIUM TOLERANT ROOTSTOCKS

L. Kocsis; M.A. Walker

14
claims
36
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Magnesium deficiency is not uncommon in the world’s vineyards, however cases where Mg levels are high (Mg above 15mg/100g soil), are less common. California’s serpentine soils in the Coastal Range are high in Mg. We established a two step trial to determine if sources of Mg tolerance exist in Vitis. To initiate the project we propagated 15 rootstocks: Riparia Gloire; Rupestris St. George; T.K. 5BB, T. 5C, 420A Mgt; 110R, 1103P; 3309C, 101-14Mgt; 1616C; Borner; Fercal; Freedom; and Ramsey. These rootstocks were treated with K2SO4 solution (30; 60; 120 mg/100g soil) until magnesium deficiency symptoms occurred on the plants. We discarded the rootstocks that displayed a low degree of Mg deficiency (T. 5C, 110R, 1103P, 3309C, 1616C, Borner), they preferred to take up Mg regardless of how high the K concentration in the soil was. We then screened the following genotypes for Mg tolerance: Riparia Gloire, St. George, Ramsey, V. longii, V. monticola, V. cordifolia, V. rufotomentosa, V. simpsonii, V. shuttleworthii, V. vulpina, V. labrusca, 101-14Mgt., T.K. 5 BB, 420A Mgt, Berlandieri x Riparia x Rupestris hybrid cv. Georgikon 103, 44-53 Malegue, Freedom, and Fercal. Two concentrations of MgSO4 solutions (1 % and 2 %) were applied by spraying the leaves. Before the plants were treated leaf samples were taken for analysis of K and Mg content. A 0.5 % NPK solution was added to each pot three times and the leaves were treated with the Mg solutions at the same time. We evaluated the number and percentage of symptomatic leaves. The fresh weight of the roots, shoots and leaves, and the dry weight of the leaves was measured and the leaf samples analyzed for K and Mg. The root weight of all genotypes decreased except V. longii, V. vulpina, St. George, and Fercal after the 2 % MgSO4 foliar application. The shoot weight of the pure Vitis species increased compared to the control, while the rootstock varieties, except Freedom decreased. Leaf weights increased in general, but decreased for Ramsey, St. George, Dog Ridge, 101-14Mgt, Fercal, and Georgikon 103. The K content of increased with treatment in the following genotypes: V. simpsonii, V. rufotomentosa, V. monticola, T.K. 5BB, 420A Mgt, Dog Ridge, 44-53 M, and Georgikon 103. The Mg content increased in all genotypes, but the differences were small. Vitis vulpina, Riparia Gloire, St. George, Concord, 101-14 Mgt, and Fercal took up the most Mg and were the most sensitive. Genotypes with the smallest change compared to their untreated controls were V. monticola, V. longii, and Georgikon 103. The K/Mg ratio was 1.1 – 3.1 times higher in the 2% Mg treated plants compared to controls. The least affected were V. simpsonii, V. longii, 420A Mgt, and Georgikon 103. The results suggest that 101-14 Mgt, Fercal, St. George, and Riparia Gloire are not useful for further Mg tolerance breeding. However, hybridization with V. simpsonii, V. longii, V. monticola and Georgikon 103, T.K. 5BB, 420 A Mgt and 44-53 M might lead to rootstocks with high Mg tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root weight decreased after 2 % MgSO4 foliar application in all genotypes except V. longii, V. vulpina, St. George, and Fercal.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Treatment
2 % MgSO4 foliar applicatione1
Outcome
root weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
except V. longii, V. vulpina, St. George, and Fercale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The root weight of all genotypes decreased except V. longii, V. vulpina, St. George, and Fercal after the 2 % MgSO4 foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot weight of pure Vitis species increased compared with the control after MgSO4 foliar application.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
pure Vitis speciese1
Treatment
MgSO4 solutionse2
Outcome
shoot weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The shoot weight of the pure Vitis species increased compared to the control, while the rootstock varieties, except Freedom decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1949 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two concentrations of MgSO4 solutions (1 % and 2 %) were applied by spraying the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot weight of rootstock varieties, except Freedom, decreased after MgSO4 foliar application.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
rootstock varietiese1
Treatment
MgSO4 solutionse2
Outcome
shoot weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
except Freedome1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The shoot weight of the pure Vitis species increased compared to the control, while the rootstock varieties, except Freedom decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1949 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two concentrations of MgSO4 solutions (1 % and 2 %) were applied by spraying the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf weights increased in general after MgSO4 foliar application.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Treatment
MgSO4 solutionse2
Outcome
Leaf weightse1
Direction
increased in generale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf weights increased in general, but decreased for Ramsey, St. George, Dog Ridge, 101-14Mgt, Fercal, and Georgikon 103”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2071 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two concentrations of MgSO4 solutions (1 % and 2 %) were applied by spraying the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf weights decreased after MgSO4 foliar application in Ramsey, St. George, Dog Ridge, 101-14Mgt, Fercal and Georgikon 103.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
Ramsey, St. George, Dog Ridge, 101-14Mgt, Fercal, and Georgikon 103e1
Treatment
MgSO4 solutionse2
Outcome
Leaf weightse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf weights increased in general, but decreased for Ramsey, St. George, Dog Ridge, 101-14Mgt, Fercal, and Georgikon 103”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2071 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two concentrations of MgSO4 solutions (1 % and 2 %) were applied by spraying the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K content increased with MgSO4 treatment in eight genotypes, including V. simpsonii, V. monticola and Georgikon 103.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
V. simpsonii, V. rufotomentosa, V. monticola, T.K. 5BB, 420A Mgt, Dog Ridge, 44-53 M, and Georgikon 103e1
Treatment
MgSO4 solutionse2
Outcome
K contente1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The K content of increased with treatment in the following genotypes: V. simpsonii, V. rufotomentosa, V. monticola, T.K. 5BB, 420A Mgt, Dog Ridge, 44-53 M, and Georgikon 103”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2246 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two concentrations of MgSO4 solutions (1 % and 2 %) were applied by spraying the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg content increased in all genotypes after MgSO4 treatment, with small differences.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Treatment
MgSO4 solutionse2
Outcome
Mg contente1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
the differences were smalle1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Mg content increased in all genotypes, but the differences were small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2248–2321 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two concentrations of MgSO4 solutions (1 % and 2 %) were applied by spraying the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1264 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitis vulpina, Riparia Gloire, St. George, Concord, 101-14 Mgt and Fercal took up the most Mg and were the most sensitive.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
Vitis vulpina, Riparia Gloire, St. George, Concord, 101-14 Mgt, and Fercale1
Outcome
took up the most Mge1
Qualifier
were the most sensitivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vitis vulpina, Riparia Gloire, St. George, Concord, 101-14 Mgt, and Fercal took up the most Mg and were the most sensitive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2323–2445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. monticola, V. longii and Georgikon 103 showed the smallest change in response to MgSO4 treatment compared with untreated controls.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
V. monticola, V. longii, and Georgikon 103e1
Treatment
MgSO4 solutionse2
Outcome
changee1
Direction
smalleste1
Comparator
untreated controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“Genotypes with the smallest change compared to their untreated controls were V. monticola, V. longii, and Georgikon 103”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2447–2566 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two concentrations of MgSO4 solutions (1 % and 2 %) were applied by spraying the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1264 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. simpsonii, V. longii, 420A Mgt and Georgikon 103 were the least affected by Mg treatment.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
V. simpsonii, V. longii, 420A Mgt, and Georgikon 103e1
Outcome
least affectede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The least affected were V. simpsonii, V. longii, 420A Mgt, and Georgikon 103”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2660–2736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The K/Mg ratio was 1.1 to 3.1 times higher in plants treated with 2 % Mg than in controls.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Treatment
2% Mge1
Outcome
K/Mg ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.1 – 3.1 timese1
Comparator
controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The K/Mg ratio was 1.1 – 3.1 times higher in the 2% Mg treated plants compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2568–2658 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks 101-14 Mgt, Fercal, St. George and Riparia Gloire are not useful for further Mg tolerance breeding.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
101-14 Mgt, Fercal, St. George, and Riparia Gloiree1
Outcome
not useful for further Mg tolerance breedinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results suggest that 101-14 Mgt, Fercal, St. George, and Riparia Gloire are not useful for further Mg tolerance breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2738–2862 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hybridization with V. simpsonii, V. longii, V. monticola, Georgikon 103, T.K. 5BB, 420 A Mgt and 44-53 M might lead to rootstocks with high Mg tolerance.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
V. simpsonii, V. longii, V. monticola and Georgikon 103, T.K. 5BB, 420 A Mgt and 44-53 Me1
Outcome
rootstocks with high Mg tolerancee1
Qualifier
mighte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, hybridization with V. simpsonii, V. longii, V. monticola and Georgikon 103, T.K. 5BB, 420 A Mgt and 44-53 M might lead to rootstocks with high Mg tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2864–3028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks with a low degree of Mg deficiency were discarded because they took up Mg regardless of soil K concentration.

Taxon
VitisVitist0
Material
T. 5C, 110R, 1103P, 3309C, 1616C, Bornere1
Outcome
low degree of Mg deficiencye1
Qualifier
they preferred to take up Mg regardless of how high the K concentration in the soil wase2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SCREENING VITIS SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“We discarded the rootstocks that displayed a low degree of Mg deficiency (T. 5C, 110R, 1103P, 3309C, 1616C, Borner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–746 · show in text ↑
e2

“they preferred to take up Mg regardless of how high the K concentration in the soil was”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–835 · show in text ↑

magnesium sulfate · growth · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.