Paper · 2014 · Acta Horticulturae

USE OF RESISTANCE INDUCERS TO CONTROL STORAGE DECAY OF SWEET CHERRY

E. Feliziani; L. Landi; G. Romanazzi

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Postharvest decay can cause severe losses of sweet cherry in storage, and the use of synthetic fungicides is not allowed after harvest on this crop. Therefore, the effectiveness of alternative means for the control of postharvest decay of sweet cherry was tested in vitro and in vivo. When amended to potato dextrose agar, oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, calcium plus organic acids (COA), and nettle macerate reduced the growth of Monilinia laxa, Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifer. Treatments of sweet cherries three days before harvest or soon after harvest with oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, COA, nettle extract, fir extract, laminarin, or potassium bicarbonate reduced brown rot, gray mold, Rhizopus rot, Alternaria rot, blue mold, and green rot of cherries kept 10 d at 20±1°C, or 14 d at 0.5±1°C and then exposed to 7 d of shelf life at 20±1°C. Among these resistance inducers, when applied either preharvest or postharvest, chitosan was one of the most effective in reducing storage decay of sweet cherry, and its antimicrobial activity in vitro and in field trials was comparable to that of the fungicide fenhexamid. Benzothiadiazole was more effective when applied postharvest than with preharvest spraying. These resistance inducers could represent good options for organic growers and food companies, or they can complement the use of synthetic fungicides in an integrated disease management strategy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amendments reduced in vitro growth of Monilinia laxa.

Taxon
SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, calcium plus organic acids (COA), and nettle maceratee0
Interactor
Monilinia laxaMonilinia laxae0pathogen
Outcome
growth of Monilinia laxae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia laxa
Monilinia laxa · InteractorArthuc01 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, calcium plus organic acids (COA), and nettle macerate reduced the growth of Monilinia laxa, Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amendments reduced in vitro growth of Botrytis cinerea.

Taxon
SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, calcium plus organic acids (COA), and nettle maceratee0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
Botrytis cinereae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, calcium plus organic acids (COA), and nettle macerate reduced the growth of Monilinia laxa, Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amendments reduced in vitro growth of Rhizopus stolonifer.

Taxon
SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, calcium plus organic acids (COA), and nettle maceratee0
Interactor
Rhizopus stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere0pathogen
Outcome
Rhizopus stolonifere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, calcium plus organic acids (COA), and nettle macerate reduced the growth of Monilinia laxa, Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest or postharvest resistance inducer treatments reduced six named storage rots of sweet cherry.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Treatment
oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, COA, nettle extract, fir extract, laminarin, or potassium bicarbonatee0
Outcome
brown rot, gray mold, Rhizopus rot, Alternaria rot, blue mold, and green rote0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
three days before harvest or soon after harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments of sweet cherries three days before harvest or soon after harvest with oligosaccharides, benzothiadiazole, chitosan, COA, nettle extract, fir extract, laminarin, or potassium bicarbonate reduced brown rot, gray mold, Rhizopus rot, Alternaria rot, blue mold, and green rot of cherries kept 10 d at 20±1°C, or 14 d at 0.5±1°C and then exposed to 7 d of shelf life at 20±1°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan was among the most effective in reducing sweet cherry storage decay before or after harvest.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
storage decaye0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
either preharvest or postharveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when applied either preharvest or postharvest, chitosan was one of the most effective in reducing storage decay of sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan antimicrobial activity was comparable to fenhexamid in vitro and in field trials.

Taxon
SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
chitosane1
Outcome
antimicrobial activitye0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
fenhexamide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its antimicrobial activity in vitro and in field trials was comparable to that of the fungicide fenhexamid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“chitosan was one of the most effective in reducing storage decay of sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzothiadiazole was more effective after harvest than with preharvest spraying.

Taxon
SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Benzothiadiazolee0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
preharvest sprayinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzothiadiazole was more effective when applied postharvest than with preharvest spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose resistance inducers for organic and integrated disease management.

Taxon
SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
Outcome
good options for organic growers and food companiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These resistance inducers could represent good options for organic growers and food companies, or they can complement the use of synthetic fungicides in an integrated disease management strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑

chitosan · disease · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · disease · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.