Paper · 2017 · Sustainable Agriculture Research

The Response of Spring Wheat Cultivars to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization under Salinity Stresses

Daishu Yi; Timothy Schwinghamer; Yolande Dalpé; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat is an important crop, playing inevitable roles in human life, ranging from major food resource to raw material for biofuel. However, due to the dramatically reduced available arable areas and increasingly severe abiotic and biotic stresses, wheat production nowadays faces extreme challenges.. Many approaches have been explored to increase wheat yield including development of new cultivars. One of the most promising approaches is the application of the naturally existent arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM), a mutualistic symbiosis originated over 400 million years ago. AM have long been known to form mutualistic symbiosis with various plants to enhance yield production and to improve stress tolerance, especially drought and salinity. But the benefits vary among AM strains and plant species. Therefore, the objective of the study was to investigate the influence of four AM strains colonized on four selected spring wheat varieties under three salt concentrations (0, 50, 100 mmol/L). The results demonstrated that wheat inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal strains Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizoglomusirregulare mitigated yield losses caused by increased salinity stresses as well as strengthened root growth in comparison with non-inoculated plant controls. Salinity stress, however, had non-significant negative effects on most variables, except for grain yield, root surface area and root dry weight, in which a significant decrease was observed in root surface area and root dry weight with the increasing of saline concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal strains Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizoglomusirregulare mitigated yield losses caused by increased salinity in wheat compared with non-inoculated controls.

Treatment
inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal strainse1
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Second interactor
Rhizoglomusirregularee1symbiont
Outcome
yield lossese1
Direction
mitigatede1
Qualifier
caused by increased salinity stressese1
Comparator
non-inoculated plant controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal strains Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizoglomusirregulare mitigated yield losses caused by increased salinity stresses as well as strengthened root growth in comparison with non-inoculated plant controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal strains Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizoglomusirregulare strengthened wheat root growth compared with non-inoculated controls.

Treatment
inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal strainse1
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Second interactor
Rhizoglomusirregularee1symbiont
Outcome
root growthe1
Direction
strengthenede1
Comparator
non-inoculated plant controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal strains Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizoglomusirregulare mitigated yield losses caused by increased salinity stresses as well as strengthened root growth in comparison with non-inoculated plant controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity stress had non-significant negative effects on most wheat variables.

Treatment
Salinity stresse1
Outcome
most variablese1
Direction
negative effectse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Salinity stress, however, had non-significant negative effects on most variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1349 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat is an important crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root surface area and root dry weight of wheat decreased significantly with increasing saline concentration.

Treatment
increasing of saline concentratione1
Outcome
root surface area and root dry weighte1
Direction
decreasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a significant decrease was observed in root surface area and root dry weight with the increasing of saline concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1543 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat is an important crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Funneliformis mosseae · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · Funneliformis mosseae · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.