Paper · 2017 · Agronomy Journal

Fungicidal Seed Coatings Exert Minor Effects on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Nutrient Content

Jesse C. Cameron; R. Michael Lehman; Peter Sexton; et al.

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Seed‐applied fungicides may inhibit arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant nutrient content. Non‐target effects of seed applied fungicides may vary with crop and genotype. No negative effects of seed applied fungicides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were found. Plant genotype affected arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization and plant nutrient content more than fungicide. Seed‐applied fungicides have become standard on commodity crop seed to control pathogenic fungi prior to germination. However, fungicidal seed coatings containing multiple systemic ingredients targeting multiple metabolic processes may inhibit non‐target soil fungi such as obligate plant symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Our experimental objectives were to: (i) determine if seed‐applied fungicidal formulations containing one or more systemic fungicides inhibit colonization of plant roots by AM fungi, plant development, or plant nutrient content during early vegetative stages of several commodity crops; (ii) identify interactions between fungicide and plant genotype. We evaluated seed‐applied fungicides labeled for use with corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and oat ( Avena sativa L.). Three corn hybrids, three soybean varieties, and two oat varieties were raised in the greenhouse for 6 wk. Three commercial fungicides containing mixtures of locally systemic, xylem‐mobile systemic, and contact active ingredients were compared to an untreated control. Plant development, plant nutrient concentration, and percent of root colonized by AM fungi (mixed species) were measured. Fungicidal seed coatings did not significantly reduce AM root colonization or P content of any plant compared to the control. There were significant ( P < 0.05) differences among fungicides in AM fungal colonization or plant nutrient content for all three plants. Plant genotype significantly affected ( P < 0.05) AM root colonization for corn, soybean, and oat. We conclude that contemporary, seed‐applied fungicidal formulations have minimal effect on AM colonization and nutrient status of corn, soybean, and oat which were more affected by host genotype.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-applied fungicide coatings did not significantly reduce AM root colonization or P content in corn compared with the untreated control.

Treatment
Fungicidal seed coatingse2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Outcome
AM root colonization or P contente2
Direction
did not significantly reducee2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“We evaluated seed‐applied fungicides labeled for use with corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and oat ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1215 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fungicidal seed coatings did not significantly reduce AM root colonization or P content of any plant compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1732 · show in text ↑
e3

“No negative effects of seed applied fungicides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–272 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments differed significantly in AM fungal colonization or plant nutrient content in all three crops.

Taxon
all three plantse4
Treatment
fungicidese4
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Outcome
AM fungal colonization or plant nutrient contente4
Direction
differencese4
Value
P < 0.05e4

Verbatim

e3

“No negative effects of seed applied fungicides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–272 · show in text ↑
e4

“There were significant ( P < 0.05) differences among fungicides in AM fungal colonization or plant nutrient content for all three plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant genotype significantly affected AM root colonization in corn, soybean and oat.

Material
Plant genotypee5
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie3symbiont
Outcome
AM root colonizatione5
Direction
significantly affectede5
Value
P < 0.05e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“No negative effects of seed applied fungicides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–272 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plant genotype significantly affected ( P < 0.05) AM root colonization for corn, soybean, and oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1872–1969 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

63 papers: 53 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 44 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.