Paper · 1940 · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)

Studies of the resistance of tobacco to a second attack of Peronospora tabacina adam

Carroll E. Cox

16
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study is concerned with the resistance of tobacco seedlings to a second attack of downy mildew caused by Peronospora tabacina Adam. Observations were made on the development and duration of resistance following recovery of tobacco seedlings from downy mildew. The duration of the period of resistance is variable and the observations indicate that plants in the greenhouse recovering during the summer remain resistant longer than do plants recovering from an initial attack during the winter. Samples of leaf tissue from recovered (resistant), infected and previously uninfected (susceptible) plants grown in soil in the greenhouse were analyzed for ammonia-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, reducing sugars and total sugars. Similar analyses were made of samples of leaf tissue from tobacco plants grown in crocks of quartz sand and irrigated with nutrient solutions and from plants grown in crocks of sand-peat mixture to which various mixed fertilizers were added. There was no correlation between the ammonia-nitrogen content of tobacco plants, as determined in these experiments, and the response of the tobacco plant and its susceptibility to attack by P. tabacina, but there was a strong indication that such a relationship exists. Recovered plants contained a higher ratio of total sugar to nitrate-nitrogen than did comparable plants which had never been infected. Furthermore the ratio of total sugar to nitrate-nitrogen was lower in plants infected for a second time than it was in plants from the same lot shortly after they had recovered from the initial attack. It seems probable however that the changes in the nitrate-nitrogen and sugar content in recovered tobacco leaves are an indication of recovery and are not responsible for the resistance possessed by such plants. A series of experiments were performed to test the immediate effect of several nutrient salts and of sugar upon the sporulation of the fungus on the leaves of diseased tobacco plants. There was a very definite response in sporulation to some of these treatments, especially to potassium nitrate, calcium nitrate, and sucrose, but it is not known whether the response of sporulation of the fungus to such treatment is related to the type of resistance possessed by recovered plants. Sodium chloride and calcium chloride were dissolved in water and applied to the soil in which young tobacco plants were growing in the greenhouse. Although increased chloride in one of the sand cultural experiments seemed to protect the plants somewhat against downy mildew, application of solutions of these salts to the soil at the rates used (100 lbs. And 138 lbs. Per acre respectively) produced no noticeable effect on the severity of the disease or subsequent recovery of the plants. The leaves of recovered (resistant) tobacco plants are usually reduced in number, the lower ones having been killed by the initial attack of the fungus. Removal of the leaves from healthy tobacco plants in imitation of this condition did not produce resistance to an attack by P. tabacina. The artificial production of necrotic areas on healthy tobacco leaves in simulation of those usually following sporulation of P. tabacina on diseased leaves had no effect either on the susceptibility of the plants to infection or upon sporulation of the fungus on leaves already infected at the time the necrotic areas were induced. Results of attempts to confer immunity from downy mildew upon an entire plant by infection of a single leaf of the plant were inconclusive, since under the conditions of the experiment it was impossible to be sure that the single leaf was infected. However, the indication is that infection of a single leaf will not render the entire plant immune from a second attack by the fungus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer-recovering greenhouse tobacco remained resistant longer than winter-recovering plants.

Outcome
resistante0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
plants recovering from an initial attack during the wintere0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants in the greenhouse recovering during the summer remain resistant longer than do plants recovering from an initial attack during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measured tobacco ammonia-nitrogen content did not correlate with response and susceptibility to P. tabacina, although a relationship was suggested.

Interactor
P. tabacinaPeronospora tabacinae0pathogen
Compound
ammonia-nitrogene0
Outcome
susceptibility to attack by P. tabacinae0
Qualifier
but there was a strong indication that such a relationship existse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Peronospora tabacina
Peronospora tabacina · InteractorR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Slide Set, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no correlation between the ammonia-nitrogen content of tobacco plants, as determined in these experiments, and the response of the tobacco plant and its susceptibility to attack by P. tabacina, but there was a strong indication that such a relationship exists.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovered tobacco had a higher total sugar to nitrate-nitrogen ratio than never-infected plants.

Outcome
ratio of total sugar to nitrate-nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants which had never been infectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recovered plants contained a higher ratio of total sugar to nitrate-nitrogen than did comparable plants which had never been infected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sugar to nitrate-nitrogen ratio was lower after a second infection than shortly after initial recovery.

Outcome
ratio of total sugar to nitrate-nitrogene0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
plants from the same lot shortly after they had recovered from the initial attacke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ratio of total sugar to nitrate-nitrogen was lower in plants infected for a second time than it was in plants from the same lot shortly after they had recovered from the initial attack”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-nitrogen and sugar changes probably indicate recovery rather than cause tobacco resistance.

Compound
nitrate-nitrogen and sugare0
Outcome
resistancee0
Qualifier
It seems probablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It seems probable however that the changes in the nitrate-nitrogen and sugar content in recovered tobacco leaves are an indication of recovery and are not responsible for the resistance possessed by such plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium nitrate produced a definite sporulation response on diseased tobacco leaves, with direction unspecified.

Taxon
funguse1
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
potassium nitratee0
Interactor
tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1host
Outcome
sporulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · InteractorJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a very definite response in sporulation to some of these treatments, especially to potassium nitrate, calcium nitrate, and sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2112 · show in text ↑
e1

“sporulation of the fungus on the leaves of diseased tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate produced a definite sporulation response on diseased tobacco leaves, with direction unspecified.

Taxon
funguse1
Treatment
calcium nitratee0
Interactor
tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1host
Outcome
sporulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · InteractorJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a very definite response in sporulation to some of these treatments, especially to potassium nitrate, calcium nitrate, and sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2112 · show in text ↑
e1

“sporulation of the fungus on the leaves of diseased tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose produced a definite sporulation response on diseased tobacco leaves, with direction unspecified.

Taxon
funguse1
Treatment
sucrosee0
Interactor
tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1host
Outcome
sporulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · InteractorJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a very definite response in sporulation to some of these treatments, especially to potassium nitrate, calcium nitrate, and sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1972–2112 · show in text ↑
e1

“sporulation of the fungus on the leaves of diseased tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased chloride appeared to offer some protection against downy mildew in a sand culture experiment.

Treatment
increased chloridee0
Outcome
downy mildewe0
Direction
protecte0
Qualifier
seemede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased chloride in one of the sand cultural experiments seemed to protect the plants somewhat against downy mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2426–2543 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied sodium chloride had no noticeable effect on disease severity or subsequent recovery.

Treatment
Sodium chloridee0
Outcome
severity of the disease or subsequent recoverye1
Direction
no noticeable effecte1
Value
100 lbs.e1
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium chloride and calcium chloride were dissolved in water and applied to the soil in which young tobacco plants were growing in the greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2270–2416 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of solutions of these salts to the soil at the rates used (100 lbs. And 138 lbs. Per acre respectively) produced no noticeable effect on the severity of the disease or subsequent recovery of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2545–2758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied calcium chloride had no noticeable effect on disease severity or subsequent recovery.

Treatment
calcium chloridee0
Outcome
severity of the disease or subsequent recoverye1
Direction
no noticeable effecte1
Value
138 lbs. Per acree1
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium chloride and calcium chloride were dissolved in water and applied to the soil in which young tobacco plants were growing in the greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2270–2416 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of solutions of these salts to the soil at the rates used (100 lbs. And 138 lbs. Per acre respectively) produced no noticeable effect on the severity of the disease or subsequent recovery of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2545–2758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovered tobacco generally had fewer leaves because lower leaves were killed by the initial fungal attack.

Interactor
funguse0pathogen
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaves of recovered (resistant) tobacco plants are usually reduced in number, the lower ones having been killed by the initial attack of the fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2760–2912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal did not induce tobacco resistance to P. tabacina.

Treatment
Removal of the leavese0
Interactor
P. tabacinaPeronospora tabacinae0pathogen
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
did not producee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Peronospora tabacina
Peronospora tabacina · InteractorR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Slide Set, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Removal of the leaves from healthy tobacco plants in imitation of this condition did not produce resistance to an attack by P. tabacina.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2913–3049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial necrotic areas did not affect tobacco susceptibility to infection.

Treatment
artificial production of necrotic arease0
Interactor
P. tabacinaPeronospora tabacinae0pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility of the plants to infectione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Peronospora tabacina
Peronospora tabacina · InteractorR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Slide Set, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The artificial production of necrotic areas on healthy tobacco leaves in simulation of those usually following sporulation of P. tabacina on diseased leaves had no effect either on the susceptibility of the plants to infection or upon sporulation of the fungus on leaves already infected at the time the necrotic areas were induced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3050–3382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial necrotic areas did not affect fungal sporulation on already infected leaves.

Taxon
P. tabacinaPeronospora tabacinae0
Treatment
artificial production of necrotic arease0
Interactor
tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0host
Outcome
sporulation of the funguse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Peronospora tabacina
Peronospora tabacina · TaxonR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Slide Set, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · InteractorJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The artificial production of necrotic areas on healthy tobacco leaves in simulation of those usually following sporulation of P. tabacina on diseased leaves had no effect either on the susceptibility of the plants to infection or upon sporulation of the fungus on leaves already infected at the time the necrotic areas were induced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3050–3382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-leaf infection experiments were inconclusive, but suggested that infection would not confer whole-plant immunity to a second attack.

Treatment
infection of a single leafe1
Outcome
immune from a second attacke1
Direction
will not rendere1
Qualifier
inconclusivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of attempts to confer immunity from downy mildew upon an entire plant by infection of a single leaf of the plant were inconclusive, since under the conditions of the experiment it was impossible to be sure that the single leaf was infected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3383–3631 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the indication is that infection of a single leaf will not render the entire plant immune from a second attack by the fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3632–3766 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–36 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sodium chloride · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.