Paper · 2012 · Annals of biological research

The effects of supplemental irrigation and N-applications on yield and yield component in two wheat cultivars in Kermanshah condition

Mohammad-Eghbal Ghobadi; Hamzeh Felehkari; Gholam Reza Mohammadi; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to effect of supplemental irrigation and nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of two wheat cultivars were performed a experimental at farm of Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University in Kermanshah in 2008-2009. Treatments included supplemental irrigation as the main plot at 4 levels (control (non irrigation) and irrigation during booting, anthesis and grain filling), nitrogen as a sub plot at 4 levels (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha-1 N net from urea source) and two wheat cultivars Sardari and Cross-Alborz as sub-sub plots. Experiment was a randomized complete block design with four replications. The result showed the effect of supplementary irrigation, N rate ant cultivar on grain yield were significant. The highest of grain yield obtained in supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stages with 362.2 and 352.0 g m-2, respectively . This influenced by increasing the number of spikes per unite area and thousand grain weight, but had not effect on the number of grain per spike. Using of 50 kg ha-1 N, with increasing grain number per spike and thousand grain weight produced the highest grain yield (335.0 g m-2). Cross-Alborz (337.8 g m-2) relative to Sardari (298.2 g m-2) indicated advantage grain yield. Cross Alborz in this experiment had the number of spikes m-2, the number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, plant height, peduncle length, the contribution of current photosynthesis, the contribution of stem reserves and straw spike reserves more than Sardari.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation, nitrogen rate and cultivar had significant effects on grain yield.

Treatment
supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result showed the effect of supplementary irrigation, N rate ant cultivar on grain yield were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at anthesis gave grain yield of 362.2 g m-2.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
362.2e0
Qualifier
anthesise0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest of grain yield obtained in supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stages with 362.2 and 352.0 g m-2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at booting gave grain yield of 352.0 g m-2 g m-2.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
352.0 g m-2e0
Qualifier
bootinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest of grain yield obtained in supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stages with 362.2 and 352.0 g m-2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation increased spikes per unit area and thousand grain weight.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stagese1
Outcome
number of spikes per unite area and thousand grain weighte0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This influenced by increasing the number of spikes per unite area and thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation did not affect grain number per spike.

Treatment
supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stagese1
Outcome
number of grain per spikee0
Direction
had not effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had not effect on the number of grain per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“supplemental irrigation at anthesis and booting stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg ha-1 N gave the highest yield of 335.0 g m-2.

Treatment
50 kg ha-1 Ne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
335.0 g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using of 50 kg ha-1 N, with increasing grain number per spike and thousand grain weight produced the highest grain yield (335.0 g m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg ha-1 N increased grain number per spike and thousand grain weight.

Treatment
50 kg ha-1 Ne0
Outcome
grain number per spike and thousand grain weighte0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using of 50 kg ha-1 N, with increasing grain number per spike and thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross-Alborz yielded 337.8 g m-2, above Sardari at 298.2 g m-2.

Material
Cross-Alborze0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
337.8 g m-2e0
Qualifier
298.2 g m-2e0
Comparator
Sardarie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cross-Alborz (337.8 g m-2) relative to Sardari (298.2 g m-2) indicated advantage grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross Alborz exceeded Sardari on seven listed yield and photosynthesis traits.

Material
Cross Alborze0
Outcome
number of spikes m-2, the number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
Sardarie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cross Alborz in this experiment had the number of spikes m-2, the number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, plant height, peduncle length, the contribution of current photosynthesis, the contribution of stem reserves and straw spike reserves more than Sardari”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross Alborz had greater plant height and peduncle length than Sardari.

Material
Cross Alborze0
Outcome
plant height, peduncle lengthe0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
Sardarie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cross Alborz in this experiment had the number of spikes m-2, the number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, plant height, peduncle length, the contribution of current photosynthesis, the contribution of stem reserves and straw spike reserves more than Sardari”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross Alborz had greater contributions from current photosynthesis, stem reserves and straw spike reserves.

Material
Cross Alborze0
Outcome
contribution of current photosynthesis, the contribution of stem reserves and straw spike reservese0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
Sardarie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cross Alborz in this experiment had the number of spikes m-2, the number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, plant height, peduncle length, the contribution of current photosynthesis, the contribution of stem reserves and straw spike reserves more than Sardari”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.