Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anastrepha fruit flies are considered one of the main phytosanitary problems for the fresh fruit industry in the USA, Caribbean islands and Latin America. Since 1994, the Mexican government has implemented the National Fruit Fly Program using an area-wide integrated pest management approach. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of mass trapping and compare it with ground GF-120 spraying against Anastrepha obliqua and Anastrepha ludens populations in mango cv. Ataulfo orchards. RESULTS: Multilure® traps baited with Ceratrap® or Biolure® captured significantly more fruit flies than Captor 300 in field cage tests. Mass trapping and ground GF-120 spray significantly suppressed fruit fly populations compared with untreated plots. In Multilure traps placed in untreated plots, we captured significantly more fruit flies than in treated plots with mass trapping or GF-120 sprays. Plots treated with either mass trapping or GF-120 sprays reduced the percentage of infested fruit significantly compared with untreated plots. There was no difference between mass trapping and GF-120 ground bait spraying. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that mass trapping was as effective as GF-120 ground spraying for the control of fruit flies in mango cv. Ataulfo orchards. The suppression effect of mass trapping was similar to GF-120 ground bait spraying. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Ceratrap-baited Multilure traps caught more fruit flies than Captor 300.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- Ceratrap®e0
- Interactor
- fruit fliese0pest
- Outcome
- fruit fliese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- Captor 300e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Multilure® traps baited with Ceratrap® or Biolure® captured significantly more fruit flies than Captor 300 in field cage tests”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Biolure-baited Multilure traps caught more fruit flies than Captor 300.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Biolure®e0
- Interactor
- fruit fliese0pest
- Outcome
- fruit fliese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- Captor 300e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Multilure® traps baited with Ceratrap® or Biolure® captured significantly more fruit flies than Captor 300 in field cage tests”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Mass trapping suppressed fruit-fly populations relative to untreated plots.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Mass trappinge0
- Interactor
- fruit flye0pest
- Outcome
- fruit fly populationse0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mass trapping and ground GF-120 spray significantly suppressed fruit fly populations compared with untreated plots”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
GF-120 spraying suppressed fruit-fly populations relative to untreated plots.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- ground GF-120 spraye0
- Interactor
- fruit flye0pest
- Outcome
- fruit fly populationse0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mass trapping and ground GF-120 spray significantly suppressed fruit fly populations compared with untreated plots”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated plots had more trap captures than mass-trapped plots.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- mass trappinge0
- Interactor
- fruit fliese0pest
- Outcome
- fruit fliese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In Multilure traps placed in untreated plots, we captured significantly more fruit flies than in treated plots with mass trapping or GF-120 sprays”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated plots had more trap captures than GF-120 sprayed plots.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- GF-120 sprayse0
- Interactor
- fruit fliese0pest
- Outcome
- fruit fliese0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In Multilure traps placed in untreated plots, we captured significantly more fruit flies than in treated plots with mass trapping or GF-120 sprays”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Mass trapping reduced infested mango fruit relative to untreated plots.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- mass trappinge0
- Outcome
- percentage of infested fruite0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plots treated with either mass trapping or GF-120 sprays reduced the percentage of infested fruit significantly compared with untreated plots”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
GF-120 sprays reduced infested mango fruit relative to untreated plots.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- GF-120 sprayse0
- Outcome
- percentage of infested fruite0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plots treated with either mass trapping or GF-120 sprays reduced the percentage of infested fruit significantly compared with untreated plots”
t0“mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Mass trapping and GF-120 bait spraying did not differ in fruit-fly control efficacy.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- mass trappinge0
- Interactor
- fruit fliest0pest
- Outcome
- no differencee0
- Direction
- no differencee0
- Comparator
- GF-120 ground bait sprayinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no difference between mass trapping and GF-120 ground bait spraying”
t0“fruit flies in mango orchards”
The same questions in other papers
application · pest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →trap barrier · pest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.