Abstract
The study was conducted to manage mango pests with maintaining fruit quality through fruit bagging technology. This research was executed from April, 2019 to August, 2019 for ensuring safe mango production with minimum use of pesticides. The fruits were bagged at the age of 45 to 50 days with different types of bags. Four treatments viz: No bagging (control), Brown paper double-layered bag; White paper single-layered bag; Transparent polythene bag were included. Apparently, brown and white paper bag showed maximum fruit weight (557.90 g and 498.67g), fruit length (10.77 and 10.67 cm), fruit diameter (24.90 and 24.67 cm) and pulp weight (465 and 453 g) respectively, compared to control treatment while polythene bag gave the minimum result. Meanwhile in bagging fruit chemical parameters of ascorbic acid, reducing and non reducing sugars, total sugars, total soluble solids, percent of citric acid and β-carotene were improved over polythene bag and control. The fruit color was non-persistent in brown paper bag. The sensory attributes of color and flavor in fruits of brown bags were improved over control. Fruit retention was significantly enhanced with brown paper bag (88.67%), white paper bag (87.00%) and control (82.33%) compared to polythene bag (61.33%). Fruits with brown paper bag gave the highest shelf life up to 12.67 days with the lowest weight loss and good physical appearances as against 10.67 days of control fruits. The infestation of fruit fly also had reduced by pre-harvest fruit bagging. These results indicate that fruit bagging can enhance fruit quality and shelf life of mango cv. BARI mango-4 through reduction insect-pest attack.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Brown paper double-layered bag gave the maximum mango fruit weight of 557.90 g compared with control.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indica
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- Brown paper double-layered bage5
- Outcome
- fruit weighte1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 557.90 ge1
- Comparator
- control treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e1“brown and white paper bag showed maximum fruit weight (557.90 g and 498.67g)”
e4“pulp weight (465 and 453 g) respectively, compared to control treatment”
e5“Brown paper double-layered bag”
Claim · model-written summary
White paper single-layered bag gave the maximum mango fruit weight of 498.67g compared with control.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- White paper single-layered bage6
- Outcome
- fruit weighte1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 498.67ge1
- Comparator
- control treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e1“brown and white paper bag showed maximum fruit weight (557.90 g and 498.67g)”
e4“pulp weight (465 and 453 g) respectively, compared to control treatment”
e6“White paper single-layered bag”
Claim · model-written summary
Brown and white paper bags gave maximum fruit length of 10.77 and 10.67 cm compared with control.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- brown and white paper bage1
- Outcome
- fruit lengthe2
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 10.77 and 10.67 cme2
- Comparator
- control treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e1“brown and white paper bag showed maximum fruit weight (557.90 g and 498.67g)”
e2“fruit length (10.77 and 10.67 cm)”
e4“pulp weight (465 and 453 g) respectively, compared to control treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Brown and white paper bags gave maximum fruit diameter of 24.90 and 24.67 cm compared with control.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- brown and white paper bage1
- Outcome
- fruit diametere3
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 24.90 and 24.67 cme3
- Comparator
- control treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e1“brown and white paper bag showed maximum fruit weight (557.90 g and 498.67g)”
e3“fruit diameter (24.90 and 24.67 cm)”
e4“pulp weight (465 and 453 g) respectively, compared to control treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Brown and white paper bags gave maximum pulp weight of 465 and 453 g compared with control.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- brown and white paper bage1
- Outcome
- pulp weighte4
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 465 and 453 ge4
- Comparator
- control treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e1“brown and white paper bag showed maximum fruit weight (557.90 g and 498.67g)”
e4“pulp weight (465 and 453 g) respectively, compared to control treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging improved ascorbic acid, reducing and non-reducing sugars and total sugars of mango fruit over polythene bag and control.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- bagginge7
- Outcome
- ascorbic acid, reducing and non reducing sugars, total sugarse7
- Direction
- improvede7
- Comparator
- polythene bag and controle7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e7“in bagging fruit chemical parameters of ascorbic acid, reducing and non reducing sugars, total sugars, total soluble solids, percent of citric acid and β-carotene were improved over polythene bag and control”
Claim · model-written summary
Bagging improved total soluble solids, citric acid and β-carotene of mango fruit over polythene bag and control.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- bagginge7
- Outcome
- total soluble solids, percent of citric acid and β-carotenee7
- Direction
- improvede7
- Comparator
- polythene bag and controle7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e7“in bagging fruit chemical parameters of ascorbic acid, reducing and non reducing sugars, total sugars, total soluble solids, percent of citric acid and β-carotene were improved over polythene bag and control”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit colour was non-persistent in brown paper bags.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- brown paper bage0
- Outcome
- fruit colore0
- Direction
- non-persistente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e0“The fruit color was non-persistent in brown paper bag”
Claim · model-written summary
Brown bags improved sensory attributes of colour and flavour of mango fruit over control.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- brown bagse1
- Outcome
- sensory attributes of color and flavore1
- Direction
- improvede1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e1“The sensory attributes of color and flavor in fruits of brown bags were improved over control”
Claim · model-written summary
Brown paper bag fruit retention of 88.67% was significantly enhanced compared with polythene bag.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- brown paper bage2
- Outcome
- Fruit retentione2
- Direction
- enhancede2
- Value
- 88.67%e2
- Comparator
- polythene bage2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e2“Fruit retention was significantly enhanced with brown paper bag (88.67%), white paper bag (87.00%) and control (82.33%) compared to polythene bag (61.33%)”
Claim · model-written summary
White paper bag fruit retention of 87.00% was significantly enhanced compared with polythene bag.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- white paper bage2
- Outcome
- Fruit retentione2
- Direction
- enhancede2
- Value
- 87.00%e2
- Comparator
- polythene bage2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e2“Fruit retention was significantly enhanced with brown paper bag (88.67%), white paper bag (87.00%) and control (82.33%) compared to polythene bag (61.33%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Brown paper bag gave the highest mango shelf life of 12.67 days, against 10.67 days for control fruit.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- brown paper bage3
- Outcome
- shelf lifee3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 12.67 dayse3
- Comparator
- control fruitse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e3“Fruits with brown paper bag gave the highest shelf life up to 12.67 days with the lowest weight loss”
e4“as against 10.67 days of control fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Brown paper bag gave the lowest mango weight loss during storage.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- brown paper bage3
- Outcome
- weight losse3
- Direction
- loweste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e3“Fruits with brown paper bag gave the highest shelf life up to 12.67 days with the lowest weight loss”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-harvest fruit bagging reduced fruit fly infestation of mango.
- Taxon
- Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- pre-harvest fruit bagginge5
- Interactor
- fruit flye5pest
- Outcome
- infestation of fruit flye5
- Direction
- reducede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Mango (Mangifera indica L.)”
e5“The infestation of fruit fly also had reduced by pre-harvest fruit bagging”
The same questions in other papers
trap barrier · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →trap barrier · pest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.