Paper · 2017 · IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science

Effect of N and Zn Use Efficiency on Yield and both nutrients uptake by Wheat

Abbas K. A. Jarallah; Hala J. A. Al- Amedy

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to know the effect of added nitrogen and zinc interaction and their use efficiency on their uptake and the yield of wheat in two different texture soils. The study included an experiment (planting in plastic pots) in which five N levels of 0, 100, 200, 300, and 400 kg N ha -1 ; five Zn levels of 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 kg Zn ha -1 and two soils, clay loam (S1) and Sandy (S2), were used. Wheat plant (Triticum aestivum L.) was used as a plant indicator. A factorial experiment, according to Complete Randomized Block Design (CRBD) with three replicates, was used. The level 100 kg N ha -1 showed higher straw, grain yield, and N use efficiency of 19.15, 15.89 g pot -1 , and 60.40%, respectively. The level 20 kg Zn ha -1 gave higher straw and grain yield of 14.99 and 26.82 g pot -1 , respectively, while the level 40 kg Zn ha -1 gave a higher Zn use efficiency of 1.50%. The clay loam soil showed a superiority of increasing the plant indicators compared with the sandy soil. The interaction of N and Zn had a significant effect on all plant indicators, the interaction treatment (200 N and 20 Zn) had a higher N and Zn use efficiency. A significant correlation relationship (quadratic equation) had been found between the added N and Zn levels with all plant indicators.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 kg N ha -1, wheat straw yield was highest at 19.15 g pot -1.

Treatment
100 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.15e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level 100 kg N ha -1 showed higher straw, grain yield, and N use efficiency of 19.15, 15.89 g pot -1 , and 60.40%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 kg N ha -1, wheat grain yield was higher at 15.89 g pot -1.

Treatment
100 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.89 g pot -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level 100 kg N ha -1 showed higher straw, grain yield, and N use efficiency of 19.15, 15.89 g pot -1 , and 60.40%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 kg N ha -1, N use efficiency was higher at 60.40%.

Treatment
100 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
60.40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level 100 kg N ha -1 showed higher straw, grain yield, and N use efficiency of 19.15, 15.89 g pot -1 , and 60.40%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 kg Zn ha -1, straw yield was higher at 14.99 g pot -1.

Treatment
20 kg Zn ha -1e0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.99e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level 20 kg Zn ha -1 gave higher straw and grain yield of 14.99 and 26.82 g pot -1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 kg Zn ha -1, grain yield was higher at 26.82 g pot -1.

Treatment
20 kg Zn ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
26.82 g pot -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level 20 kg Zn ha -1 gave higher straw and grain yield of 14.99 and 26.82 g pot -1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 kg Zn ha -1, Zn use efficiency was higher at 1.50%.

Treatment
40 kg Zn ha -1e0
Outcome
Zn use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the level 40 kg Zn ha -1 gave a higher Zn use efficiency of 1.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clay loam soil increased plant indicators relative to sandy soil.

Treatment
clay loam soile0
Outcome
plant indicatorse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
sandy soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The clay loam soil showed a superiority of increasing the plant indicators compared with the sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N and Zn interaction significantly affected all plant indicators.

Treatment
N and Zne0
Outcome
all plant indicatorse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of N and Zn had a significant effect on all plant indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 N and 20 Zn treatment gave higher N and Zn use efficiency.

Treatment
200 N and 20 Zne0
Outcome
N and Zn use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction treatment (200 N and 20 Zn) had a higher N and Zn use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Added N and Zn levels were significantly quadratically correlated with all plant indicators.

Treatment
added N and Zn levelse0
Outcome
all plant indicatorse0
Qualifier
quadratic equatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant correlation relationship (quadratic equation) had been found between the added N and Zn levels with all plant indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.