Paper · 1998

Influence of growth method on yield components of yard long bean (Vigna sesquipedalis)

Josip Borošić; Bruno Novak; Dean Ban

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The yard long bean is an unknown vegetable in Croatia. the main aims of research for its introduction in production were the following: the favourable cultivars, optimum plant density, the kind and height of suppor, the influence of pruning by the lateral shoots on harvest course, labour for harvesting, possibility of storing. As related to the cultivar and cultivation method, the yield of pods amount from 0.92 up to 2.84 kg/m2 in unheated plastic house, with harvesting time of 60 to 80 days and 0.70 to 1.77 kg/m2 in the field, with harvesting time from 55 to 70 days. In relation to the cultivar and place of growth, in the first three weeks of harvest, the yield of 27 up to 55% was obtained. The majority of harvested pods (35 to 41%) was in the category of 30 to 40 cm length. The pruning of lateral shots was not significant, it showed a decrease of yield of 25%. The increase of support height from 1.6 up to 2.0 doubled the yield of pods. There was no remarkable difference in pod yield, either with the plastic net as the support, or with the plastic cord winding wound around each indivindual plant. Depending on the place and growth method, the harvesting of one kilogram of pods required from 14 to 24 minutes. The pods under higher air temperatures are of a low keeping quality. Already after three days of storing in paper bags at the room temperature (of 20 to 25 C), the loss of water amounted from 15 to 20%, and in refrigerator (from 8 to 10 C) 5 to 10%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield ranged from 0.92 to 2.84 kg/m2 in an unheated plastic house.

Outcome
yield of podse0
Value
0.92 up to 2.84 kg/m2e0
Setting
unheated plastic housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of pods amount from 0.92 up to 2.84 kg/m2 in unheated plastic house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–457 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield ranged from 0.70 to 1.77 kg/m2 in the field.

Outcome
0.70 to 1.77 kg/m2e0
Value
0.70 to 1.77 kg/m2e0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.70 to 1.77 kg/m2 in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first three harvest weeks supplied 27 to 55% of pod yield, depending on cultivar and site.

Outcome
yielde0
Value
27 up to 55%e0
Qualifier
first three weeks of harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the first three weeks of harvest, the yield of 27 up to 55% was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most harvested pods, 35 to 41%, were 30 to 40 cm long.

Outcome
harvested podse0
Value
35 to 41%e0
Qualifier
30 to 40 cm lengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The majority of harvested pods (35 to 41%) was in the category of 30 to 40 cm length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning lateral shoots was nonsignificant and reduced yield by 25%.

Treatment
pruning of lateral shotse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pruning of lateral shots was not significant, it showed a decrease of yield of 25%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing support height from 1.6 to 2.0 doubled pod yield.

Treatment
support height from 1.6 up to 2.0e0
Outcome
yield of podse0
Direction
doublede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of support height from 1.6 up to 2.0 doubled the yield of pods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield showed no remarkable difference between plastic-net and plastic-cord supports.

Treatment
plastic nete0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
no remarkable differencee0
Comparator
plastic corde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no remarkable difference in pod yield, either with the plastic net as the support, or with the plastic cord winding wound around each indivindual plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting one kilogram of pods required 14 to 24 minutes depending on cultivation.

Outcome
harvesting of one kilogram of podse0
Value
14 to 24 minutese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the harvesting of one kilogram of pods required from 14 to 24 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod keeping quality was low at higher air temperatures.

Outcome
keeping qualitye0
Direction
lowe0
Setting
higher air temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pods under higher air temperatures are of a low keeping quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods lost 15 to 20% water after three days in paper bags at room temperature.

Outcome
loss of watere0
Value
15 to 20%e0
Setting
room temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after three days of storing in paper bags at the room temperature (of 20 to 25 C), the loss of water amounted from 15 to 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods lost 5 to 10% water after three days in a refrigerator.

Outcome
5 to 10%e0
Value
5 to 10%e0
Setting
refrigeratore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis · TaxonDavid · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in refrigerator (from 8 to 10 C) 5 to 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“yard long bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pruning · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.