Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed management in no-tilled dribbling maize for small land holder

Pijush Kanti Mukherjee; Anwesh Rai

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during winter (Rabi) seasons of 2012–13 and 2013–14 at research farm of Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal with the objectives to study the weed control practices in no-tilled dibbling maize within rice residues. The experiment consisted of eight treatments, comprising of varying doses of 2,4-D (post-emergence treatment), atrazine with sequential application as pre-emergence and post-emergence treatment, pendimethalin followed by atrazine, weedy check and complete weed-free treatments, laid out in randomised block design (RBD) with four replications. Highest weed control efficiency and lowest weed index values were registered by atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence. The dominant weed flora were the broad-leaved weeds Polygonum persicaria, P. pensylvanicum, P. orientale, and the grasses Digitaria ciliaris, Setaria glauca. Among the weed control practices, season long weed free condition recorded the highest grain/kernel yield of maize (9.52 and 10.6 t/ha) during both the years, which was statistically at par with atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence (9.3 and 10.4 t/ha) and atrazine 0.75 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence (9.07 and 10.12 t/ha). The atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence gave maximum net return of (‘ 93,650/ha and ’ 1,21,050/ha) and maximum net return per rupee invested (1.88 and 2.31).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha pre-emergence followed by 1.1 kg/ha post-emergence gave the highest weed control efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergencee1
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
Higheste1
Setting
research farm of Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“no-tilled dribbling maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was carried out during winter (Rabi) seasons of 2012–13 and 2013–14 at research farm of Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest weed control efficiency and lowest weed index values were registered by atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha pre-emergence followed by 1.1 kg/ha post-emergence gave the lowest weed index.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergencee1
Outcome
weed index valuese1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“no-tilled dribbling maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest weed control efficiency and lowest weed index values were registered by atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weed-free condition gave the highest grain yield of maize, 9.52 and 10.6 t/ha, statistically at par with atrazine 1.0 kg/ha pre-emergence plus 1.1 kg/ha post-emergence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
season long weed free conditione2
Outcome
grain/kernel yield of maizee2
Direction
higheste2
Value
9.52 and 10.6 t/hae2
Qualifier
9.3 and 10.4 t/hae2
Comparator
atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergencee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“no-tilled dribbling maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e2

“season long weed free condition recorded the highest grain/kernel yield of maize (9.52 and 10.6 t/ha) during both the years, which was statistically at par with atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence (9.3 and 10.4 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha pre-emergence plus 1.1 kg/ha post-emergence gave the maximum net return of 93,650/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergencee3
Outcome
net returne3
Direction
maximume3
Value
93,650/hae3
Qualifier
1,21,050/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“no-tilled dribbling maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e3

“The atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence gave maximum net return of (‘ 93,650/ha and ’ 1,21,050/ha) and maximum net return per rupee invested (1.88 and 2.31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine 1.0 kg/ha pre-emergence plus 1.1 kg/ha post-emergence gave the maximum net return per rupee invested, 1.88 and 2.31.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergencee3
Outcome
net return per rupee investede3
Direction
maximume3
Value
1.88 and 2.31e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“no-tilled dribbling maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e3

“The atrazine 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + atrazine 1.1 kg/ha as post-emergence gave maximum net return of (‘ 93,650/ha and ’ 1,21,050/ha) and maximum net return per rupee invested (1.88 and 2.31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dominant weed flora in no-tilled dribbling maize were Polygonum persicaria and Digitaria ciliaris, among other broad-leaved and grass weeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Polygonum persicariaPersicaria maculosae4weed
Second interactor
Digitaria ciliarisDigitaria ciliarise4weed
Outcome
dominant weed florae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Persicaria maculosa
Persicaria maculosa · InteractorBjoertvedt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Digitaria ciliaris
Digitaria ciliaris · Second interactorForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“no-tilled dribbling maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e4

“The dominant weed flora were the broad-leaved weeds Polygonum persicaria, P. pensylvanicum, P. orientale, and the grasses Digitaria ciliaris, Setaria glauca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–940 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 102 positive, 78 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.