Abstract
Soybean is a very valuable crop plant and the soybean crop area is continually increasing in the world and in Poland. The effectiveness of soybean cultivation depends on soil and climatic conditions as well as on appropriate tillage. An alternative for plough tillage in the cultivation of soybean is to grow this crop using no-tillage, the popularity of which is constantly growing. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) on yield, weed infestation and qualitative seed composition of soybean grown under the conditions of the Lublin Upland. A field study was carried out over the period 2009-2012 at the Czeslawice Experimental Farm (51° 18′ 23″ N, 22° 16′ 2″ E). The experiment was set up on loess-derived grey-brown podzolic soil as a split-block design in four replicates. The experimental factors were the following tillage systems: conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT). The soybean cultivar Nawiko was grown in the experiment. The present study showed that the soybean seed yield obtained under CT was higher by 24.3% than under NT. The main reason of the seeds yield decrease in the NT was less soybean plant density. The significant higher number and weight of weeds were recorded in NT, relative to CT. The oil content in seed harvested from the NT plots was found to be higher by 0.3%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage increased soybean seed yield by 24.3% relative to no-tillage.
- Taxon
- Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- CTe0
- Outcome
- soybean seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 24.3%e0
- Comparator
- NTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The present study showed that the soybean seed yield obtained under CT was higher by 24.3% than under NT.”
t0“Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower soybean plant density was identified as the main reason for lower seed yield under no-tillage.
- Taxon
- Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- NTe0
- Outcome
- seeds yield decreasee0
- Qualifier
- less soybean plant densitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The main reason of the seeds yield decrease in the NT was less soybean plant density.”
t0“Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage increased weed number and weight relative to conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- NTe0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- number and weight of weedse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- CTe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The significant higher number and weight of weeds were recorded in NT, relative to CT.”
t0“Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage increased seed oil content by 0.3%.
- Taxon
- Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- NTe0
- Outcome
- oil content in seede0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.3%e0
- Comparator
- CTe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The oil content in seed harvested from the NT plots was found to be higher by 0.3%.”
t0“Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.”
e1“The present study showed that the soybean seed yield obtained under CT was higher by 24.3% than under NT.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: oil · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →tillage · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.