Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agricultural Sciences – Sri Lanka

Yield, Weed Infestation and Seed Quality of Soybean Glycine max L. Merr. under Different Tillage Systems

Małgorzata Haliniarz; Dorota Gawęda; R. Cierpiała; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Soybean is a very valuable crop plant and the soybean crop area is continually increasing in the world and in Poland. The effectiveness of soybean cultivation depends on soil and climatic conditions as well as on appropriate tillage. An alternative for plough tillage in the cultivation of soybean is to grow this crop using no-tillage, the popularity of which is constantly growing. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) on yield, weed infestation and qualitative seed composition of soybean grown under the conditions of the Lublin Upland. A field study was carried out over the period 2009-2012 at the Czeslawice Experimental Farm (51° 18′ 23″ N, 22° 16′ 2″ E). The experiment was set up on loess-derived grey-brown podzolic soil as a split-block design in four replicates. The experimental factors were the following tillage systems: conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT). The soybean cultivar Nawiko was grown in the experiment. The present study showed that the soybean seed yield obtained under CT was higher by 24.3% than under NT. The main reason of the seeds yield decrease in the NT was less soybean plant density. The significant higher number and weight of weeds were recorded in NT, relative to CT. The oil content in seed harvested from the NT plots was found to be higher by 0.3%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased soybean seed yield by 24.3% relative to no-tillage.

Taxon
Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.Glycine maxt0
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
soybean seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
24.3%e0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present study showed that the soybean seed yield obtained under CT was higher by 24.3% than under NT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower soybean plant density was identified as the main reason for lower seed yield under no-tillage.

Taxon
Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.Glycine maxt0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
seeds yield decreasee0
Qualifier
less soybean plant densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main reason of the seeds yield decrease in the NT was less soybean plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased weed number and weight relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon
Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.Glycine maxt0
Treatment
NTe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number and weight of weedse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significant higher number and weight of weeds were recorded in NT, relative to CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased seed oil content by 0.3%.

Taxon
Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.Glycine maxt0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
oil content in seede0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.3%e0
Comparator
CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The oil content in seed harvested from the NT plots was found to be higher by 0.3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean Glycine max L. Merr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The present study showed that the soybean seed yield obtained under CT was higher by 24.3% than under NT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1106 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: oil · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 25 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.