Paper · 2017 · Frontiers in Plant Science

The Influence of the Plant Growth Regulator Maleic Hydrazide on Egyptian Broomrape Early Developmental Stages and Its Control Efficacy in Tomato under Greenhouse and Field Conditions

Ariel Venezian; Evgenia Dor; Guy Achdari; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Broomrapes (Phelipanche spp. and Orobanche spp.) are holoparasitic plants that cause tremendous losses of agricultural crops worldwide. Broomrape control is extremely difficult and only amino acid biosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides present an acceptable control level. It is expected that broomrape resistance to these herbicides is not long in coming. Our objective was to develop a broomrape control system in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) based on the plant-growth regulator maleic hydrazide (MH). Petri-dish and polyethylene-bag system experiments revealed that MH has a slight inhibitory effect on Phelipanche aegyptiaca seed germination but is a potent inhibitor of the first stages of parasitism, namely attachment and the tubercle stage. MH phytotoxicity toward tomato and its P. aegyptiaca-control efficacy were tested in greenhouse experiments. MH was applied at 25, 50, 75, 150, 300 and 600 g a.i. ha-1 to tomato foliage grown in P. aegyptiaca-infested soil at 200 growing degree days (GDD) and again at 400 GDD. The treatments had no influence on tomato foliage or root dry weight. The total number of P. aegyptiaca attachments counted on the roots of the treated plants was significantly lower at 75 g a.i. ha-1 and also at higher MH rates. Phelipanche aegyptiaca biomass was close to zero at rates of 150, 300 and 600 g a.i. ha-1 MH. Field experiments were conducted to optimize the rate, timing and number of MH applications. Two application sequences gave superior results, both with five split applications applied at 100, 200, 400, 700 and 1000 GDD: (a) constant rate of 400 g a.i. ha-1; (b) first two applications at 270 g a.i. ha-1 and the next three applications at 540 g a.i. ha-1. Based on the results of this study, MH was registered for use in Israel in 2013 with the specified protocol and today, it is widely used by most Israeli tomato growers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maleic hydrazide had a slight inhibitory effect on Phelipanche aegyptiaca seed germination.

Taxon
Phelipanche aegyptiacaPhelipanche aegyptiacae0
Treatment
MHe0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
slight inhibitory effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phelipanche aegyptiaca
Phelipanche aegyptiaca · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category(c) Nasser Halaweh, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MH has a slight inhibitory effect on Phelipanche aegyptiaca seed germination but is a potent inhibitor of the first stages of parasitism, namely attachment and the tubercle stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maleic hydrazide was a potent inhibitor of the first stages of Phelipanche aegyptiaca parasitism, namely attachment and the tubercle stage.

Taxon
Phelipanche aegyptiacaPhelipanche aegyptiacae0
Treatment
MHe0
Outcome
first stages of parasitisme0
Direction
potent inhibitore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phelipanche aegyptiaca
Phelipanche aegyptiaca · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category(c) Nasser Halaweh, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MH has a slight inhibitory effect on Phelipanche aegyptiaca seed germination but is a potent inhibitor of the first stages of parasitism, namely attachment and the tubercle stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maleic hydrazide treatments (25 to 600 g a.i. ha-1) had no influence on tomato foliage or root dry weight in greenhouse experiments.

Treatment
MH was applied at 25, 50, 75, 150, 300 and 600 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
tomato foliage or root dry weighte1
Direction
no influencee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MH was applied at 25, 50, 75, 150, 300 and 600 g a.i. ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatments had no influence on tomato foliage or root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The total number of P. aegyptiaca attachments on roots of treated plants was significantly lower at 75 g a.i. ha-1 and at higher maleic hydrazide rates.

Taxon
P. aegyptiacaPhelipanche aegyptiacae0
Treatment
MHe0
Outcome
total number of P. aegyptiaca attachmentse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
75 g a.i. ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phelipanche aegyptiaca
Phelipanche aegyptiaca · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category(c) Nasser Halaweh, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total number of P. aegyptiaca attachments counted on the roots of the treated plants was significantly lower at 75 g a.i. ha-1 and also at higher MH rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phelipanche aegyptiaca biomass was close to zero at maleic hydrazide rates of 150, 300 and 600 g a.i. ha-1.

Taxon
Phelipanche aegyptiacaPhelipanche aegyptiacae0
Treatment
MHe0
Outcome
Phelipanche aegyptiaca biomasse0
Direction
close to zeroe0
Value
150, 300 and 600 g a.i. ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phelipanche aegyptiaca
Phelipanche aegyptiaca · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category(c) Nasser Halaweh, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phelipanche aegyptiaca biomass was close to zero at rates of 150, 300 and 600 g a.i. ha-1 MH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In field experiments, two sequences of five split maleic hydrazide applications at 100, 200, 400, 700 and 1000 GDD (a constant 400 g a.i. ha-1, or 270 then 540 g a.i. ha-1) gave superior results.

Treatment
five split applications applied at 100, 200, 400, 700 and 1000 GDDe0
Outcome
superior resultse0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Two application sequences gave superior results, both with five split applications applied at 100, 200, 400, 700 and 1000 GDD: (a) constant rate of 400 g a.i. ha-1; (b) first two applications at 270 g a.i. ha-1 and the next three applications at 540 g a.i. ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1705 · show in text ↑

Maleic hydrazide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.