Paper · 2025 · Weed Technology

Refining use of chemigated rimsulfuron for branched broomrape management in California processing tomato

Matthew Fatino; Bradley D. Hanson

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Branched broomrape management is of increasing concern to California processing tomato growers. Field research was conducted in 2023 and 2024 to evaluate various application timings of chemigated rimsulfuron alone, preplant-incorporated (PPI) sulfosulfuron paired with chemigated rimsulfuron, and foliar maleic hydrazide alone and paired with PPI sulfosulfuron and chemigated rimsulfuron. In 2023, all treatments with 70 g ai ha −1 rimsulfuron, alone or paired with PPI sulfosulfuron, reduced broomrape emergence 77% to 92% compared to the nontreated control. In 2024, broomrape pressure was higher, and all rimsulfuron treatments reduced broomrape emergence 68% to 86% compared to the control. In both years, five applications of foliar maleic hydrazide reduced broomrape emergence through at least mid-season. The 2024 experiment included a combination treatment of PPI sulfosulfuron, chemigated rimsulfuron, and foliar maleic hydrazide, which resulted in <4 broomrape clusters plot −1 . In a 2024 grower-scale demonstration trial, two application regimes totaling 70 g ai ha −1 of chemigated rimsulfuron reduced broomrape emergence 83% to 89% compared to the control. Overall, chemigated rimsulfuron applied at various timings and rates totaling 70 g ai ha −1 reduced broomrape emergence by two-thirds or more compared to the nontreated plots. No crop injury was observed in trials with rimsulfuron, sulfosulfuron, or maleic hydrazide treatments in small-plot trials or with rimsulfuron in the grower-scale demonstration trial. Under a recently approved 24(c) Special Local Need label, California growers can use three applications of rimsulfuron applied via chemigation to suppress broomrape in known infested fields or to reduce the risk of broomrape establishment in fields of concern for this quarantine pest. Promising results from sulfosulfuron and maleic hydrazide suggest that registering additional herbicides could help develop even more robust branched broomrape management programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2023, rimsulfuron alone or paired with sulfosulfuron reduced branched broomrape emergence by 77% to 92% compared with the nontreated control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
rimsulfurone0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape emergencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
77% to 92%e0
Qualifier
alone or paired with PPI sulfosulfurone0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Verbatim

t0

“California processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 2023, all treatments with 70 g ai ha −1 rimsulfuron, alone or paired with PPI sulfosulfuron, reduced broomrape emergence 77% to 92% compared to the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2024, all rimsulfuron treatments reduced branched broomrape emergence by 68% to 86% compared with the control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
rimsulfuron treatmentse2
Interactor
broomrapee2parasite
Outcome
broomrape emergencee2
Direction
reducede2
Value
68% to 86%e2
Qualifier
broomrape pressure was highere2
Comparator
the controle2

Verbatim

t0

“California processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2024, broomrape pressure was higher, and all rimsulfuron treatments reduced broomrape emergence 68% to 86% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five applications of foliar maleic hydrazide reduced branched broomrape emergence through at least mid-season.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
five applications of foliar maleic hydrazidee3
Interactor
broomrapee3parasite
Outcome
broomrape emergencee3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
through at least mid-seasone3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“California processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“In both years, five applications of foliar maleic hydrazide reduced broomrape emergence through at least mid-season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of PPI sulfosulfuron, chemigated rimsulfuron and foliar maleic hydrazide gave fewer than 4 broomrape clusters per plot in 2024.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
PPI sulfosulfuron, chemigated rimsulfuron, and foliar maleic hydrazidee4
Interactor
broomrapee4parasite
Outcome
broomrape clusterse4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Value
<4 broomrape clusterse4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“California processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“The 2024 experiment included a combination treatment of PPI sulfosulfuron, chemigated rimsulfuron, and foliar maleic hydrazide, which resulted in <4 broomrape clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a 2024 grower-scale demonstration trial, two application regimes totaling 70 g ai ha −1 of chemigated rimsulfuron reduced broomrape emergence by 83% to 89% compared with the control.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
chemigated rimsulfurone5
Interactor
broomrapee5parasite
Outcome
broomrape emergencee5
Direction
reducede5
Value
83% to 89%e5
Qualifier
two application regimes totaling 70 g ai ha −1e5
Comparator
controle5
Setting
grower-scale demonstration triale5

Verbatim

t0

“California processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e5

“In a 2024 grower-scale demonstration trial, two application regimes totaling 70 g ai ha −1 of chemigated rimsulfuron reduced broomrape emergence 83% to 89% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemigated rimsulfuron at various timings and rates totaling 70 g ai ha −1 reduced broomrape emergence by two-thirds or more compared with nontreated plots.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
chemigated rimsulfurone6
Interactor
broomrapee6parasite
Outcome
broomrape emergencee6
Direction
reducede6
Value
two-thirds or moree6
Qualifier
at various timings and ratese6
Comparator
nontreated plotse6

Verbatim

t0

“California processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall, chemigated rimsulfuron applied at various timings and rates totaling 70 g ai ha −1 reduced broomrape emergence by two-thirds or more compared to the nontreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No crop injury was observed in processing tomato in small-plot trials with rimsulfuron, sulfosulfuron or maleic hydrazide.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
rimsulfuron, sulfosulfuron, or maleic hydrazide treatmentse7
Outcome
crop injurye7
Setting
small-plot trialse7

Verbatim

t0

“California processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e7

“No crop injury was observed in trials with rimsulfuron, sulfosulfuron, or maleic hydrazide treatments in small-plot trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1478 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Registering additional herbicides could help develop more robust branched broomrape management programs in processing tomato.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Outcome
robust branched broomrape management programse1

Verbatim

t0

“California processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Promising results from sulfosulfuron and maleic hydrazide suggest that registering additional herbicides could help develop even more robust branched broomrape management programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–2005 · show in text ↑

rimsulfuron · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Maleic hydrazide · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

rimsulfuron · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 38 positive, 6 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

application · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 225 positive, 28 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.