Abstract

Production gaps exist in vegetable crops at the farm level in inland and coastal regions of Bangladesh and these gaps could be minimized using different innovative/new agricultural technologies and improved crop management practices. The present study was conducted to compare yield, yield components of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), and income of smallholder vegetable farmers within different innovative technology practices (with plastic mulch and indigenous microorganism (IMO) vs. without plastic mulch and IMO) at Baliakandi, Rajbari (inland region); and Dashmina, Patuakhali; and Charfession, Bhola (coastal region) in Bangladesh. Yield and gross margins of cauliflower and tomato with plastic mulch and IMO were higher compared with no plastic mulch and no IMO, regardless of location. At Baliakandi, Rajbari, cauliflower yield with plastic mulch was 42.5 t ha–1, which was a 24.3% improvement over cauliflower yield obtained without plastic mulch (34.2 t ha–1). At Charfession, Bhola, the highest yield of tomato (57.6 t ha–1) was obtained with IMO compared with tomato yield (49.2 t ha–1) without IMO, indicating a 17.1% improvement in yield. Similar trends were obtained at Dashmina, Patuakhali. The difference in gross margin between tomato with and without plastic mulch was US$ 1146 ha–1 at Dashmina, Patuakhali. Similar trends were obtained in other locations. Innovative agricultural technologies have the potential to increase yield and income of smallholder vegetable farmers in inland and coastal regions of Bangladesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mulch and IMO raised cauliflower and tomato yields across locations.

Treatment
plastic mulch and IMOe0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no plastic mulch and no IMOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and gross margins of cauliflower and tomato with plastic mulch and IMO were higher compared with no plastic mulch and no IMO, regardless of location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mulch and IMO raised gross margins across locations.

Treatment
plastic mulch and IMOe0
Outcome
gross marginse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no plastic mulch and no IMOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and gross margins of cauliflower and tomato with plastic mulch and IMO were higher compared with no plastic mulch and no IMO, regardless of location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch raised cauliflower yield by 24.3% to 42.5 t per hectare at Baliakandi.

Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
cauliflower yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
42.5 t ha–1e0
Qualifier
24.3%e0
Comparator
without plastic mulche0
Setting
Baliakandi, Rajbarie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Baliakandi, Rajbari, cauliflower yield with plastic mulch was 42.5 t ha–1, which was a 24.3% improvement over cauliflower yield obtained without plastic mulch (34.2 t ha–1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IMO raised tomato yield by 17.1% to 57.6 t per hectare at Charfession.

Treatment
IMOe0
Outcome
yield of tomatoe0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
57.6 t ha–1e0
Qualifier
17.1%e0
Comparator
without IMOe0
Setting
Charfession, Bholae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Charfession, Bhola, the highest yield of tomato (57.6 t ha–1) was obtained with IMO compared with tomato yield (49.2 t ha–1) without IMO, indicating a 17.1% improvement in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1206 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A similar tomato yield trend occurred at Dashmina.

Outcome
yieldt0
Setting
Dashmina, Patuakhalie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trends were obtained at Dashmina, Patuakhali.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plastic mulch and indigenous microorganism effects on yield and yield components of cauliflower and tomato in inland and coastal regions of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mulch related tomato gross margin difference was US$ 1146 per hectare at Dashmina.

Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
gross margine0
Value
US$ 1146 ha–1e0
Comparator
without plastic mulche0
Setting
Dashmina, Patuakhalie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in gross margin between tomato with and without plastic mulch was US$ 1146 ha–1 at Dashmina, Patuakhali.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross margin trends were similar at other locations.

Outcome
gross margine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trends were obtained in other locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“difference in gross margin between tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1306 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

61 papers: 49 positive, 12 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 62 positive, 4 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.