Paper · 2017 · Journal of Horticulture and Forestry

Farmyard manure and intra-row spacing on yield and yield components of Adama Red onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivar under irrigation in Gewane District, Afar Region, Ethiopia

Asres Mekonnen Derajew; Gedamu Mihretu Fikreyohannes; Woldetsadik Kebede

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Gewane Agricultural Technical and Vocational Education and Training College in 2012/2013 to assess effect of farmyard manure and intra-row spacing on yield and yield components of Adama Red onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivar under irrigation. Factorial combination of four rates of farmyard manure (0, 10, 20 and 30 t ha-1) and four levels of intra-row spacing (7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 cm) were arranged in randomized complete block design with three replications. Significant effect of intra-row spacing on most of plant growth, bulb yield and bulb characters studied was noticed. Similarly, farmyard manure showed significant effect on mean bulb weight, weight loss, and bulb rotting. The interaction effects of intra-row spacing and farmyard manure rates showed significant influence on biological, total, marketable and unmarketable bulb yields. Highest total bulb yield, 58.74 t ha-1 and marketable bulb yields 57.77 t ha-1 were obtained from plants spaced at 7.5 cm and plots received 30 t ha-1 farm yard manure. The highest weight loss and bulb rotting were observed at wider intra-row spacing (15 cm) and highest farmyard manure application, which was 30 t ha-1. Intra-row spacing of 7.5 cm and 20 t ha-1 farmyard manure rate gave good marketable bulb yield and better storage life under the study area. Key words: Bulb yield; farmyard manure; intra-row spacing; storage life.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing significantly affected most plant growth, bulb yield and bulb character variables of Adama Red onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Material
Adama Redt0
Treatment
intra-row spacinge0
Outcome
plant growth, bulb yield and bulb characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adama Red onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant effect of intra-row spacing on most of plant growth, bulb yield and bulb characters studied was noticed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure significantly affected mean bulb weight, weight loss and bulb rotting in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
farmyard manuree0
Outcome
mean bulb weight, weight loss, and bulb rottinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adama Red onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“farmyard manure showed significant effect on mean bulb weight, weight loss, and bulb rotting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of intra-row spacing and farmyard manure rates significantly influenced biological and total bulb yields of onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
intra-row spacing and farmyard manure ratese0
Outcome
biological, totale0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adama Red onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction effects of intra-row spacing and farmyard manure rates showed significant influence on biological, total, marketable and unmarketable bulb yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of intra-row spacing and farmyard manure rates significantly influenced marketable and unmarketable bulb yields of onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
intra-row spacing and farmyard manure ratese0
Outcome
marketable and unmarketable bulb yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adama Red onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction effects of intra-row spacing and farmyard manure rates showed significant influence on biological, total, marketable and unmarketable bulb yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest total bulb yield, 58.74 t ha-1, came from plants spaced at 7.5 cm with 30 t ha-1 farmyard manure.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plants spaced at 7.5 cm and plots received 30 t ha-1 farm yard manuree0
Outcome
total bulb yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
58.74 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adama Red onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest total bulb yield, 58.74 t ha-1 and marketable bulb yields 57.77 t ha-1 were obtained from plants spaced at 7.5 cm and plots received 30 t ha-1 farm yard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest marketable bulb yield, 57.77 t ha-1, came from plants spaced at 7.5 cm with 30 t ha-1 farmyard manure.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
plants spaced at 7.5 cm and plots received 30 t ha-1 farm yard manuree0
Outcome
marketable bulb yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
57.77 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adama Red onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest total bulb yield, 58.74 t ha-1 and marketable bulb yields 57.77 t ha-1 were obtained from plants spaced at 7.5 cm and plots received 30 t ha-1 farm yard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest weight loss and bulb rotting occurred at the widest intra-row spacing (15 cm) with the highest farmyard manure rate of 30 t ha-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
wider intra-row spacing (15 cm) and highest farmyard manure applicatione0
Outcome
weight loss and bulb rottinge0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adama Red onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest weight loss and bulb rotting were observed at wider intra-row spacing (15 cm) and highest farmyard manure application, which was 30 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1199 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing of 7.5 cm with 20 t ha-1 farmyard manure gave good marketable bulb yield and better storage life in the study area.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
good marketable bulb yield and better storage lifee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Adama Red onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intra-row spacing of 7.5 cm and 20 t ha-1 farmyard manure rate gave good marketable bulb yield and better storage life under the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1340 · show in text ↑

density · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.