Paper · 2019 · International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Effect of agro industrial wastes compost on soil health and onion yields improvements: study at field condition

Feyisa Girma Erana; Tesfaye Alemu Tenkegna; Seyoum Leta Asfaw

12
claims
30
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Industries are generating numerous amount and types of organic wastes to the environment. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of agro industrial wastes compost on soil physicochemical quality, soil microbial population, growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition . The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized plot design at field condition. Allium cepa L. was grown using five different levels of agro industrial wastes compost, three different levels of inorganic fertilizers and three controls. Compost amendment improved the soil pH, TOC, TKN, field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC), cultivable bacterial count and fungi. But no significant effect was found on electrical conductivity (EC), available phosphorus (P) compared to the control. Exchangeable Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, and Cu increased while Pb, Cr, and Mn value showed no significant change with compost application. Field application of compost improved onion shoot numbers, shoot girth, and shoot length. Further, significant shoot weight and bulb weight were also obtained after compost treatment. After compost amendment significant improvement in soil fertility and onion yield was obtained. This can be recommended for small scale farmer’s food security improvement and combined with agro industrial wastes management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost amendment improved soil pH, TOC and TKN relative to control in an onion field trial.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
Compost amendmente1
Outcome
soil pH, TOC, TKNe1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
field conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compost amendment improved the soil pH, TOC, TKN, field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC), cultivable bacterial count and fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–729 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
e3

“But no significant effect was found on electrical conductivity (EC), available phosphorus (P) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost amendment improved field capacity, permanent wilting point and available water content relative to control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
Compost amendmente1
Outcome
field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC)e1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
field conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compost amendment improved the soil pH, TOC, TKN, field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC), cultivable bacterial count and fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–729 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
e3

“But no significant effect was found on electrical conductivity (EC), available phosphorus (P) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost amendment improved cultivable bacterial count and fungi relative to control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
Compost amendmente1
Outcome
cultivable bacterial count and fungie1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
field conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compost amendment improved the soil pH, TOC, TKN, field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC), cultivable bacterial count and fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–729 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
e3

“But no significant effect was found on electrical conductivity (EC), available phosphorus (P) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost had no significant effect on soil electrical conductivity or available phosphorus compared to control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
Composte1
Outcome
electrical conductivity (EC), available phosphorus (P)e3
Direction
no significant effecte3
Comparator
controle3
Setting
field conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compost amendment improved the soil pH, TOC, TKN, field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC), cultivable bacterial count and fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–729 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
e3

“But no significant effect was found on electrical conductivity (EC), available phosphorus (P) compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased exchangeable Na, K and Ca in soil.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Treatment
Composte2
Outcome
Exchangeable Na, K, Cae1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Exchangeable Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, and Cu increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–902 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compost amendment improved the soil pH, TOC, TKN, field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC), cultivable bacterial count and fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–729 · show in text ↑
e3

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased exchangeable Mg, Fe and Zn in soil.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Treatment
Composte2
Outcome
Mg, Fe, Zne1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Exchangeable Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, and Cu increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–902 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compost amendment improved the soil pH, TOC, TKN, field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC), cultivable bacterial count and fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–729 · show in text ↑
e3

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased exchangeable Cu in soil.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Treatment
Composte2
Outcome
Cue1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
field conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Exchangeable Na, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, and Cu increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–902 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compost amendment improved the soil pH, TOC, TKN, field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), and available water content (AWC), cultivable bacterial count and fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–729 · show in text ↑
e3

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost application showed no significant change in soil Pb, Cr and Mn.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
compost applicatione1
Outcome
Pb, Cr, and Mne1
Direction
no significant changee1
Setting
field conditione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“while Pb, Cr, and Mn value showed no significant change with compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–983 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field application of compost improved onion shoot numbers, shoot girth and shoot length.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
Field application of composte1
Outcome
shoot numbers, shoot girth, and shoot lengthe1
Direction
improvede1
Setting
field conditione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Field application of compost improved onion shoot numbers, shoot girth, and shoot length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1073 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost treatment gave significant shoot weight and bulb weight in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
compost treatmente1
Outcome
shoot weight and bulb weighte1
Setting
field conditione2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significant shoot weight and bulb weight were also obtained after compost treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1167 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost amendment gave a significant improvement in soil fertility and onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
compost amendmente1
Outcome
soil fertility and onion yielde1
Direction
improvemente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“After compost amendment significant improvement in soil fertility and onion yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1263 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Compost amendment is recommended for small-scale farmers to improve food security.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Outcome
food security improvemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This can be recommended for small scale farmer’s food security improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1339 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.) under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–309 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

other · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 81 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

other · soil: biology · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.