Paper · 2004 · HortTechnology

Evaluation of commercial inorganic and organic fertilizer effects on arbuscular mycorrhizae formed by Glomus intraradices

R.G. Linderman; E.A. Davis

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
49
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Formation and function of arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) are affected by levels of fertility in soil or fertilizers applied to soilless container mixes. For AM fungi, phosphorus (P) is the main element influencing colonization of host plant roots. The question addressed in this study was whether inorganic or organic fertilizers were more compatible with the formation and function of AM. Several controlled-release inorganic (CRI) fertilizers were compared with several organic (OR) fertilizers at different rates (½× to 4× the recommended rate) to determine (1) threshold levels of tolerance by the AM fungus Glomus intraradices in relation to root colonization, and (2) growth responses of `Guardsman' bunching onion ( Allium cepa ) and `Orange Cupido' miniature rose ( Rosa spp.) plants grown in a soilless potting mix or sandy loam soil. AM colonization in soil was greatly decreased or totally inhibited by CRI fertilizers with high P content at the 2× rate or greater, whereas colonization was decreased but never eliminated by low-P OR fertilizers at the 3× rate or greater. Shoot growth of onions was similar with or without AM inoculation when fertilized with CRI, but in general was only enhanced by OR fertilizers if inoculated with AM fungi, compared to the noninoculated controls. Shoot and root growth of onions were significantly increased by AM inoculation when OR fertilizers were used at the 1× rate. In contrast, root growth was not increased by the combination of CRI fertilizers and AM fungal inoculation. Inoculation of miniature roses grown in sandy loam amended with 25% peat and perlite and fertilized with all the CRI or OR fertilizers resulted in high AM colonization, but without much AM-induced growth increase except where OR fertilizers or CRI fertilizers with low P were used. In a soilless potting mix, growth of miniature roses was less with OR fertilizers at the rates used than CRI fertilizers, but mycorrhiza formation was greater in the former unless P was low in the latter. These results indicate that release of nutrients from organic fertilizers, as a result of microbial activity, favors AM establishment and function more than most inorganic fertilizers unless P levels of the latter are low.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-P inorganic fertilizer strongly reduced or eliminated AM colonization in soil at 2× or higher.

Treatment
CRI fertilizers with high P content at the 2× rate or greatere0
Interactor
AMe0
Outcome
AM colonization in soile0
Direction
greatly decreased or totally inhibitede0

Not reportedTaxonInteractor roleComparator

Verbatim

e0

“AM colonization in soil was greatly decreased or totally inhibited by CRI fertilizers with high P content at the 2× rate or greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-P organic fertilizer reduced but did not eliminate AM colonization at 3× or higher.

Treatment
low-P OR fertilizers at the 3× rate or greatere0
Outcome
colonizatione0
Direction
decreased but never eliminatede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“colonization was decreased but never eliminated by low-P OR fertilizers at the 3× rate or greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion shoot growth was similar with and without AM inoculation under CRI fertilizer.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0
Outcome
Shoot growthe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
without AM inoculatione0

Not reportedInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth of onions was similar with or without AM inoculation when fertilized with CRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation generally enhanced onion shoot growth under organic fertilizer.

Treatment
inoculated with AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0
Outcome
enhancede0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
noninoculated controlse0

Not reportedTaxonInteractor role

Verbatim

e0

“in general was only enhanced by OR fertilizers if inoculated with AM fungi, compared to the noninoculated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation significantly increased onion shoot and root growth at the 1× organic-fertilizer rate.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0
Outcome
Shoot and root growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
OR fertilizers were used at the 1× ratee0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot and root growth of onions were significantly increased by AM inoculation when OR fertilizers were used at the 1× rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of CRI fertilizer and AM inoculation did not increase onion root growth.

Treatment
combination of CRI fertilizers and AM fungal inoculatione0
Interactor
AM fungale0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
not increasede0

Not reportedTaxonInteractor roleComparator

Verbatim

e0

“root growth was not increased by the combination of CRI fertilizers and AM fungal inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1524 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated roses had high AM colonization across tested fertilizers.

Taxon
miniature rosese0
Interactor
AMe0
Outcome
AM colonizatione0
Direction
highe0
Setting
sandy loame0

Not reportedInteractor role

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of miniature roses grown in sandy loam amended with 25% peat and perlite and fertilized with all the CRI or OR fertilizers resulted in high AM colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1693 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated roses showed little growth gain except under organic or low-P inorganic fertilizer.

Outcome
AM-induced growth increasee0
Direction
without muche0
Qualifier
except where OR fertilizers or CRI fertilizers with low P were usede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“without much AM-induced growth increase except where OR fertilizers or CRI fertilizers with low P were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roses in soilless mix grew less with organic than inorganic fertilizer.

Taxon
miniature rosese0
Treatment
OR fertilizerse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
CRI fertilizerse0
Setting
soilless potting mixe0

Verbatim

e0

“In a soilless potting mix, growth of miniature roses was less with OR fertilizers at the rates used than CRI fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roses formed more mycorrhizae with organic than inorganic fertilizer unless inorganic phosphorus was low.

Outcome
mycorrhiza formatione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
unless P was low in the lattere0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhiza formation was greater in the former unless P was low in the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2011 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

53 papers: 48 positive, 5 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

99 papers: 89 positive, 10 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

cultivation system · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 251 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.