Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The consortium treatment gave maximum plant height of 64.24 ± 3.22 cm.

A claim from Influence of PGPR, AM Fungi and Conventional Chemical Fertilizers Armament on Growth, Yield Quality, Nutrient’s translocations and Quercetin Content in Onion Crop Cultivated in Semi-Arid Region of India · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium treatment gave maximum plant height of 64.24 ± 3.22 cm.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
consortium (NPK) + Azospirillum + AM fungie0
Outcome
Heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
64.24 ± 3.22 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Height (64.24 ± 3.22 cm) and the number of leaves (13.58 ± 3.12) of the plant was maximum with the application of the consortium (NPK) + Azospirillum + AM fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1002
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–157

Title

Influence of PGPR, AM Fungi and Conventional Chemical Fertilizers Armament on Growth, Yield Quality, Nutrient’s translocations and Quercetin Content in Onion Crop Cultivated in Semi-Arid Region of India

Prasad K Open Access Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology 2022. doi:10.23880/oajmb-16000214

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-70cc287c6396cc90fe658c1a27c04cb04eb9ba1efa44fd9631a8e632c738efe0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

53 papers: 48 positive, 5 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this claim · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

285 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.