Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azospirillum with recommended fertilizer produced the highest bulb dry mass, 45.7 q/ha.

A claim from Influence of biofertilizers on Microbial Count and Nutrient uptake of kharif onion (Allium cepa L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum with recommended fertilizer produced the highest bulb dry mass, 45.7 q/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Azospirillum along with recommended fertilizer dose (T3)e0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
Bulb dry masse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
45.7 q/hae0
Comparator
Azotobacter along with recommended fertilizer dose (T1)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest Bulb dry mass (45.7 q/ha) and stover dry mass (27.9 q/ha) was observed in Azospirillum along with recommended fertilizer dose (T3) followed by Azotobacter along with recommended fertilizer dose (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–502
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82

Title

Influence of biofertilizers on Microbial Count and Nutrient uptake of kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)

Dilpreet Talwar; Kulbir Singh; S.S. Walia International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology 2017. doi:10.5958/2230-732x.2017.00036.5

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e6d39a0eec774c44e2ef249a7e745499bf30d9d6535269e7f647609de87fa590 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this claim · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

285 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.