Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azotobacter with mycorrhizae and fertilizer attained the highest phosphorus uptake, 21.5 Kg ha−1.

A claim from Influence of biofertilizers on Microbial Count and Nutrient uptake of kharif onion (Allium cepa L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter with mycorrhizae and fertilizer attained the highest phosphorus uptake, 21.5 Kg ha−1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Azotobacter along with Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and recommended fertilizer dose (T9)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.5 Kg ha−1e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest phosphorus uptake (21.5 Kg ha−1) was attained with application of Azotobacter along with Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and recommended fertilizer dose (T9) over all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–923
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82

Title

Influence of biofertilizers on Microbial Count and Nutrient uptake of kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)

Dilpreet Talwar; Kulbir Singh; S.S. Walia International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology 2017. doi:10.5958/2230-732x.2017.00036.5

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-76075cc4e81f8bfcc24f3a97f4ffb2ffc7f1fca19c009623611c3675048380a4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 81 positive, 9 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.