Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Soil enzymes, microbial biomass carbon and microbial population as influenced by integrated nutrient management under onion cultivation in sub-tropical zone of Jammu

Renu Gupta; AP Rai; Sanjay Swami

19
claims
40
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted for two consecutive years to evaluate onion (Allium cepa L.) performance, soil fertility build-up and estimation of soil enzymes, soil microbial biomass and microbial population under integrated nutrient management with two organic manures viz. vermicompost and farmyard manure (FYM) in combination with NPK fertilizers in sub-tropical zone of Jammu. The treatments tested were: T1- control; T2 - 100% NPK alone; T3 - 100% NPK + 12.5 t FYM ha-1; T4 - 100% NPK + 25 t FYM ha-1; T5 - 100% NPK + 12.5 t vermicompost ha-1; T6 - 100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1. The maximum onion yield was recorded with the application of 100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1 (T6) during both the years i.e. 9.63 and 10.34 t ha-1. The application of FYM @ 25 t ha-1 (T4) recorded 23 and 18% increase in yield of onion over 100% NPK alone (T2) during 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively, whereas vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 (T6) recorded 39 and 31% increased onion yield. A comparison between FYM and vermicompost receiving treatments revealed that the treatments receiving same quantity of vermicompost recorded higher yield in comparison to FYM. Furthermore, yield of onion obtained with 12.5 t vermicompost ha-1 plus 100% NPK (T5) during both the years was at par with that received under 25 t FYM ha-1 plus 100% NPK (T4) demonstrating superiority of vermicompost over FYM. Application of vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 plus 100% NPK (T6) also increased N uptake over 100% NPK alone (T2) by 120 and 138% by onion during both the consecutive years, respectively. The corresponding increase in P uptake was 164 and 130% whereas in case of K, it was 112 and 171%. The highest soil available N, P and K content was observed with T6, as 296, 25.7 and 343 kg ha-1. The treatment T6 also increased organic carbon content over 100% NPK treated plots (T2) by 58%. Microbial population increased by 149% cfu × 10-4 and 70% cfu × 10-4 in T6 over control and T2, respectively. Soil microbial biomass varied considerably among treatments and ranged from 41 to 143 mg kg-1 and the highest microbial biomass was recorded in T6. Phosphatase activity exhibited increasing trend with the application of both FYM and vermicompost and the highest value was observed in T6. NPK fertilizers alone recorded significantly higher phosphatase activity and it increased by 36% over control. Use of chemical fertilizers alone i.e. 100% NPK exhibited a lower dehydrogenase activity compared with conjoined use of inorganic and organic treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave the maximum onion yield in both years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1e0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.63 and 10.34 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum onion yield was recorded with the application of 100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1 (T6) during both the years i.e. 9.63 and 10.34 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased onion yield by 23% in 2012-13 relative to T2.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
FYM @ 25 t ha-1e0
Outcome
yield of onione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23e0
Qualifier
2012-13e0
Comparator
100% NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM @ 25 t ha-1 (T4) recorded 23 and 18% increase in yield of onion over 100% NPK alone (T2) during 2012-13 and 2013-14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased onion yield by 18% in 2013-14 relative to T2.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
FYM @ 25 t ha-1e0
Outcome
yield of onione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18%e0
Qualifier
2013-14e0
Comparator
100% NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM @ 25 t ha-1 (T4) recorded 23 and 18% increase in yield of onion over 100% NPK alone (T2) during 2012-13 and 2013-14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased onion yield by 39% in the first year.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1e0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 (T6) recorded 39 and 31% increased onion yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased onion yield by 31% in the second year.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1e0
Outcome
onion yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31%e0
Qualifier
2013-14e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 (T6) recorded 39 and 31% increased onion yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“during 2012-13 and 2013-14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equal quantities, vermicompost gave higher onion yield than FYM.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments receiving same quantity of vermicompost recorded higher yield in comparison to FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Furthermore, yield of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 onion yield was at par with T4 in both years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
12.5 t vermicompost ha-1 plus 100% NPKe0
Outcome
yield of onione0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
25 t FYM ha-1 plus 100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of onion obtained with 12.5 t vermicompost ha-1 plus 100% NPK (T5) during both the years was at par with that received under 25 t FYM ha-1 plus 100% NPK (T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased onion N uptake by 120 and 138% over T2 in successive years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 plus 100% NPKe0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
120 and 138%e0
Comparator
100% NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 plus 100% NPK (T6) also increased N uptake over 100% NPK alone (T2) by 120 and 138% by onion during both the consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased onion P uptake by 164 and 130% in successive years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 plus 100% NPKe2
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
164 and 130%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding increase in P uptake was 164 and 130%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“by onion during both the consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1543 · show in text ↑
e2

“vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 plus 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased onion K uptake by 112 and 171% in successive years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 plus 100% NPKe2
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasee3
Value
112 and 171%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of K, it was 112 and 171%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1656 · show in text ↑
e1

“by onion during both the consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1543 · show in text ↑
e2

“vermicompost @ 25 t ha-1 plus 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1430 · show in text ↑
e3

“corresponding increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave the highest available soil N, P and K contents of 296, 25.7 and 343 kg ha-1, respectively.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1e1
Outcome
soil available N, P and K contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
296, 25.7 and 343 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest soil available N, P and K content was observed with T6, as 296, 25.7 and 343 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1754 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e2

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased soil organic carbon by 58% over T2.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1e1
Outcome
organic carbon contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
58%e0
Comparator
100% NPK treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T6 also increased organic carbon content over 100% NPK treated plots (T2) by 58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1850 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e2

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased microbial population by 149% over control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1e1
Outcome
Microbial populatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
149% cfu × 10-4e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial population increased by 149% cfu × 10-4 and 70% cfu × 10-4 in T6 over control and T2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1852–1960 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e2

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased microbial population by 70% over T2.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1e1
Outcome
Microbial populatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
70% cfu × 10-4e0
Comparator
T2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial population increased by 149% cfu × 10-4 and 70% cfu × 10-4 in T6 over control and T2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1852–1960 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% NPK + 25 t vermicompost ha-1 (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–686 · show in text ↑
e2

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial biomass ranged from 41 to 143 mg kg-1 and was highest in T6.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Outcome
Soil microbial biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41 to 143 mg kg-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil microbial biomass varied considerably among treatments and ranged from 41 to 143 mg kg-1 and the highest microbial biomass was recorded in T6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2108 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM increased soil phosphatase activity.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
Phosphatase activitye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphatase activity exhibited increasing trend with the application of both FYM and vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2207 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased soil phosphatase activity, with the highest value in T6.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
Phosphatase activitye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphatase activity exhibited increasing trend with the application of both FYM and vermicompost and the highest value was observed in T6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2248 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK alone increased phosphatase activity by 36% over control, significantly.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
NPK fertilizers alonee0
Outcome
phosphatase activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK fertilizers alone recorded significantly higher phosphatase activity and it increased by 36% over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2250–2359 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer alone gave lower dehydrogenase activity than combined inorganic and organic treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
100% NPKe0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
conjoined use of inorganic and organic treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% NPK exhibited a lower dehydrogenase activity compared with conjoined use of inorganic and organic treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2400–2513 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–88 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 81 positive, 9 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.