Paper · 2012 · Tropical Agriculture

Evaluation of the performance of an underground drip irrigation system in fertigating sugarcane 17

L. P. Vidhana Arachchi; Y. Katsuta; D. M. A. Gunaratna

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Efficient use of nutrient and water through underground drip irrigation is one of the options to optimize sugarcane production with minimal ground water pollution. Experiments were conducted at the Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Subtropical Research Station, Ishigaki, Okinawa, to (1) investigate the suitability of drip-tubing materials for fertigation, (2) find out the most suitable liquid poly feed fertilizer mixture and its application frequency, and (3) compare slow and rapid nutrient releasing granular fertilizers with liquid fertilizer mixtures in order to optimize sugarcane production. Stem cuttings and shoots of NiF 8 sugarcane variety were fertigated with the poly-feed 2, 3, 5, and 6 liquid fertilizer mixtures at different frequencies. Rapid (N-15 and N-16) and slow (424-70 and 424-140) nutrient releasing fertilizers were applied manually to sugarcane and irrigated through the drip system. Results showed that the growth of shoot-planted sugarcane in all treatment combinations was higher than that of stem-planted sugarcane. Vegetative growth of sugarcane was greatly promoted in irrigated, organic matter ameliorated soil compared to un-irrigated rapid nutrient releasing fertilizer mixtures. Among poly-feed fertilizers, the poly-feed 3 (15(N):30(P):15(K) + micro-elements) fertilizer mixture resulted in increasing height, diameter, and weight of stem of shoot-planted sugarcane, when compared to unirrigated organic matter amended soil by 44%, 10%, and 66% respectively. The increases of similar parameters in stem-planted sugarcane were 45%, 14%, and 38%. Moreover, fortnightly application of poly-feed fertilizers for stem and shoot planted sugarcane gave the highest growth performance while application of once in two months, resulted in the lowest. In addition, the highest growth performance in both shoot and stem-planted sugarcane was observed in the irrigated 424-70 slow nutrient releasing fertilizer mixture application. Super typhoon 120 was the most suitable tubing material for under ground drip systems in sugarcane cultivation. It is evident from results, that either fertigating of poly-feed 3 fertilizers fortnightly or slow nutrient releasing granular fertilizer (424-70) application linking with underground tubing material of drip line 2000 greatly promoted the sugarcane production; subsequently those practices could be extremely useful to minimize ground water pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot-planted sugarcane grew more than stem-planted sugarcane across treatments.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
shoot-planted sugarcanee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
stem-planted sugarcanee0

Verbatim

e0

“growth of shoot-planted sugarcane in all treatment combinations was higher than that of stem-planted sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and organic matter promoted vegetative growth relative to unirrigated rapid-release fertilizer.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
irrigated, organic matter ameliorated soile0
Outcome
Vegetative growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
un-irrigated rapid nutrient releasing fertilizer mixturese0

Verbatim

e0

“Vegetative growth of sugarcane was greatly promoted in irrigated, organic matter ameliorated soil compared to un-irrigated rapid nutrient releasing fertilizer mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poly-feed 3 increased shoot-planted stem height by 44%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
shoot-planted sugarcanee0
Treatment
poly-feed 3 (15(N):30(P):15(K) + micro-elements) fertilizer mixturee0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
unirrigated organic matter amended soile0

Verbatim

e0

“poly-feed 3 (15(N):30(P):15(K) + micro-elements) fertilizer mixture resulted in increasing height, diameter, and weight of stem of shoot-planted sugarcane, when compared to unirrigated organic matter amended soil by 44%, 10%, and 66% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poly-feed 3 increased shoot-planted stem diameter by 10%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
shoot-planted sugarcanee0
Treatment
poly-feed 3e0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
unirrigated organic matter amended soile0

Verbatim

e0

“poly-feed 3 (15(N):30(P):15(K) + micro-elements) fertilizer mixture resulted in increasing height, diameter, and weight of stem of shoot-planted sugarcane, when compared to unirrigated organic matter amended soil by 44%, 10%, and 66% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poly-feed 3 increased shoot-planted stem weight by 66%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
shoot-planted sugarcanee0
Treatment
poly-feed 3e0
Outcome
weight of steme0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
66%e0
Comparator
unirrigated organic matter amended soile0

Verbatim

e0

“poly-feed 3 (15(N):30(P):15(K) + micro-elements) fertilizer mixture resulted in increasing height, diameter, and weight of stem of shoot-planted sugarcane, when compared to unirrigated organic matter amended soil by 44%, 10%, and 66% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-planted sugarcane height increased 45%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
stem-planted sugarcanee0
Outcome
similar parameterse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
45%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The increases of similar parameters in stem-planted sugarcane were 45%, 14%, and 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-planted sugarcane diameter increased 14%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
stem-planted sugarcanee0
Outcome
similar parameterse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The increases of similar parameters in stem-planted sugarcane were 45%, 14%, and 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-planted sugarcane stem weight increased 38%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
stem-planted sugarcanee0
Outcome
similar parameterse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
38%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The increases of similar parameters in stem-planted sugarcane were 45%, 14%, and 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fortnightly poly-feed gave the highest growth performance.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
fortnightly application of poly-feed fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth performancee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
once in two monthse0

Verbatim

e0

“fortnightly application of poly-feed fertilizers for stem and shoot planted sugarcane gave the highest growth performance while application of once in two months, resulted in the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application once in two months gave the lowest growth performance.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
once in two monthse0
Outcome
growth performancee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
fortnightly application of poly-feed fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“fortnightly application of poly-feed fertilizers for stem and shoot planted sugarcane gave the highest growth performance while application of once in two months, resulted in the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated 424-70 fertilizer gave the highest growth performance.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
irrigated 424-70 slow nutrient releasing fertilizer mixture applicatione0
Outcome
growth performancee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“highest growth performance in both shoot and stem-planted sugarcane was observed in the irrigated 424-70 slow nutrient releasing fertilizer mixture application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–1988 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super typhoon 120 was identified as the most suitable tubing material.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
Super typhoon 120e0
Outcome
most suitable tubing materiale0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Super typhoon 120 was the most suitable tubing material for under ground drip systems in sugarcane cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2100 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend fortnightly poly-feed 3 or granular 424-70 with drip line 2000 for production and pollution reduction.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
poly-feed 3 fertilizers fortnightlye0
Outcome
minimize ground water pollutione0

Verbatim

e0

“either fertigating of poly-feed 3 fertilizers fortnightly or slow nutrient releasing granular fertilizer (424-70) application linking with underground tubing material of drip line 2000 greatly promoted the sugarcane production; subsequently those practices could be extremely useful to minimize ground water pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2135–2452 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 47 positive, 7 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

organic · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.