Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, quality and soil health of spring planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) in West Bengal

KEYA BANERJEE; A.M. PUSTE; S.K. GUNRI; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out during 3 consecutive cropping seasons of 2013–14, 2014–15, and 2015–16 at Bethuadahari, Nadia, West Bengal to evaluate the effect of organic manure and biofertilizers in combination with inorganic fertilizer as the source of nitrogen (N) on growth, yield attributes, cane yield, juice quality, leaf nutrient and chlorophyll content, and soil health after harvesting of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrid complex) (cv. CoB 94164). The experiment consist of 7 treatments, viz. T1 , control; T2 , 100% recommended dose of N through inorganic; T3 , 75% recommended dose of N through inorganic + 25% recommended dose of N through FYM; T4 , 50% recommended dose of N through inorganic + 50% recommended dose of N through FYM; T5 , T3 + Azotobacter; T6 , T3 + Azospirillum; T7 , T3 + Azotobacter + Azospirillum, respectively in a randomized block design (RBD) with 3 replications. The results revealed that, application of N through organic manure and biofertilizer along with chemical fertilizer increased growth characters, viz. leaf-area index (LAI), total dry matter (TDM), chlorophyll content and N, P, K and S concentration in leaf tissues as compared to inorganic fertilizer alone. The maximum cane yield (86.10 t/ha) and sucrose content (17.52%) were recorded under the treatment T7 (75% recommended dose of N through inorganic + 25% recommended dose of N through FYM + Azotobacter + Azospirillum). Cane yield exhibited significant positive correlation with different growth and yield attributes as well as with juice quality and vice-versa. The organic carbon, available N, P2 O5 and K2 O contents of soil increased slightly after harvest of the crop due to the incorporation of organic manures and biofertilizers in soils initially. Thus, 25% of the recommended dose of nitrogen through inorganic sources could be replaced by FYM and biofertilizers for obtaining higher sugarcane yield along with improvement of soil health status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure and biofertilizer with chemical fertilizer increased sugarcane leaf area index and total dry matter relative to inorganic fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of N through organic manure and biofertilizer along with chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf-area index (LAI), total dry matter (TDM)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of N through organic manure and biofertilizer along with chemical fertilizer increased growth characters, viz. leaf-area index (LAI), total dry matter (TDM), chlorophyll content and N, P, K and S concentration in leaf tissues as compared to inorganic fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient application increased sugarcane chlorophyll content relative to inorganic fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of N through organic manure and biofertilizer along with chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of N through organic manure and biofertilizer along with chemical fertilizer increased growth characters, viz. leaf-area index (LAI), total dry matter (TDM), chlorophyll content and N, P, K and S concentration in leaf tissues as compared to inorganic fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient application increased sugarcane leaf N, P, and K concentrations relative to inorganic fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of N through organic manure and biofertilizer along with chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
N, P, K and S concentration in leaf tissuese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inorganic fertilizer alonee0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of N through organic manure and biofertilizer along with chemical fertilizer increased growth characters, viz. leaf-area index (LAI), total dry matter (TDM), chlorophyll content and N, P, K and S concentration in leaf tissues as compared to inorganic fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 produced the maximum cane yield of 86.10 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
T7 (75% recommended dose of N through inorganic + 25% recommended dose of N through FYM + Azotobacter + Azospirillum)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
86.10 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum cane yield (86.10 t/ha) and sucrose content (17.52%) were recorded under the treatment T7 (75% recommended dose of N through inorganic + 25% recommended dose of N through FYM + Azotobacter + Azospirillum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T7 produced the maximum sucrose content of 17.52%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
T7 (75% recommended dose of N through inorganic + 25% recommended dose of N through FYM + Azotobacter + Azospirillum)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
sucrose contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
17.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum cane yield (86.10 t/ha) and sucrose content (17.52%) were recorded under the treatment T7 (75% recommended dose of N through inorganic + 25% recommended dose of N through FYM + Azotobacter + Azospirillum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1426 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield was positively correlated with growth and yield attributes and juice quality.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
Cane yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
different growth and yield attributes as well as with juice qualitye0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cane yield exhibited significant positive correlation with different growth and yield attributes as well as with juice quality and vice-versa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon and available N, P2 O5, and K2 O increased slightly after harvest following incorporation of organic manures and biofertilizers.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
incorporation of organic manures and biofertilizers in soils initiallye0
Outcome
organic carbon, available N, P2 O5 and K2 O contents of soile0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
slightly after harvest of the crope0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The organic carbon, available N, P2 O5 and K2 O contents of soil increased slightly after harvest of the crop due to the incorporation of organic manures and biofertilizers in soils initially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1762 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend replacing 25% of recommended inorganic nitrogen with FYM and biofertilizers to obtain higher sugarcane yield and improve soil health.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
25% of the recommended dose of nitrogen through inorganic sources could be replaced by FYM and biofertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“25% of the recommended dose of nitrogen through inorganic sources could be replaced by FYM and biofertilizers for obtaining higher sugarcane yield along with improvement of soil health status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1961 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azospirillum · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

8 of 19 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.