Abstract
Field experiment was undertaken to evaluate the response of sugarcane variety CoC 24 to application of bioinoculants, viz., Gluconoacetobacter diazotrophicus, AM fungi and Azophos (Azospirillum and phosphobacteria), under different levels of N, P2O5 and K2O inorganic fertilizer. The results revealed that the application of mycorrhizae, G. diazotrophicus, Azospirillum and phosphobacteria significantly produced higher cane yield in plant crop. The application of Gluconoacetobacter diazotrophicus @10 kg + AM fungi @ 50 kg/ ha + Azophos @10 kg + 75 % NPK recorded higher germination (87.36 %) and maximum tiller population (1,94,185/ha). The soil samples were collected before planting and after application of inorganic fertilizers and bioinoculants and were analyzed for the microbial population count and also for the dynamics in the soil nutritional status. The bacterial, fungal and diazotrophs population was also maximum with the application of G. diazotrophicus+ AM fungi + Azophos + 75 % NPK. It also significantly enhanced the total nitrogen content, available phosphorous, potassium and organic carbon content in the soil. We have also recorded the maximum mean millable cane population of 1.32 lakhs /ha, cane yield (137.45 t/ha) and sugar yield (16.96 t/ha). Applied bacterial sources helped in nitrogen fixation. Continuous mobilization and solubilisation of nutrients and their persistence and colonization in soil was an added advantage which also enhanced the soil fertility.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Combined mycorrhizae and bacterial inoculants significantly raised plant-crop cane yield.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of mycorrhizae, G. diazotrophicus, Azospirillum and phosphobacteriae0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizaee0symbiont
- Outcome
- cane yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- G. diazotrophicus, Azospirillum and phosphobacteriae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the application of mycorrhizae, G. diazotrophicus, Azospirillum and phosphobacteria significantly produced higher cane yield in plant crop.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculants and 75% NPK produced germination at 87.36 %.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Gluconoacetobacter diazotrophicus @10 kg + AM fungi @ 50 kg/ ha + Azophos @10 kg + 75 % NPKe0
- Interactor
- Gluconoacetobacter diazotrophicuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
- Outcome
- germinatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 87.36 %e0
- Qualifier
- Azophose0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The application of Gluconoacetobacter diazotrophicus @10 kg + AM fungi @ 50 kg/ ha + Azophos @10 kg + 75 % NPK recorded higher germination (87.36 %) and maximum tiller population (1,94,185/ha).”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculants and 75% NPK produced tiller population at 1,94,185/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Gluconoacetobacter diazotrophicus @10 kg + AM fungi @ 50 kg/ ha + Azophos @10 kg + 75 % NPKe0
- Interactor
- Gluconoacetobacter diazotrophicuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
- Outcome
- tiller populatione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1,94,185/hae0
- Qualifier
- Azophose0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The application of Gluconoacetobacter diazotrophicus @10 kg + AM fungi @ 50 kg/ ha + Azophos @10 kg + 75 % NPK recorded higher germination (87.36 %) and maximum tiller population (1,94,185/ha).”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined inoculants and 75% NPK gave the maximum bacterial, fungal and diazotroph populations.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of G. diazotrophicus+ AM fungi + Azophos + 75 % NPKe0
- Interactor
- G. diazotrophicuse0symbiont
- Second interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
- Outcome
- bacterial, fungal and diazotrophs populatione0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The bacterial, fungal and diazotrophs population was also maximum with the application of G. diazotrophicus+ AM fungi + Azophos + 75 % NPK.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculants and fertilizer significantly enhanced soil total nitrogen, available phosphorous and potassium.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Outcome
- total nitrogen content, available phosphorous, potassiume0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“It also significantly enhanced the total nitrogen content, available phosphorous, potassium and organic carbon content in the soil.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculants and fertilizer significantly enhanced soil organic carbon.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“It also significantly enhanced the total nitrogen content, available phosphorous, potassium and organic carbon content in the soil.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum millable cane population of 1.32 lakhs /ha.
Verbatim
e0“maximum mean millable cane population of 1.32 lakhs /ha, cane yield (137.45 t/ha) and sugar yield (16.96 t/ha).”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum cane yield of 137.45 t/ha.
Verbatim
e0“maximum mean millable cane population of 1.32 lakhs /ha, cane yield (137.45 t/ha) and sugar yield (16.96 t/ha).”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment produced maximum sugar yield of 16.96 t/ha.
Verbatim
e0“maximum mean millable cane population of 1.32 lakhs /ha, cane yield (137.45 t/ha) and sugar yield (16.96 t/ha).”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Applied bacterial sources helped nitrogen fixation.
Verbatim
e0“Applied bacterial sources helped in nitrogen fixation.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient mobilization, solubilisation, persistence and soil colonization enhanced soil fertility.
Verbatim
e0“Continuous mobilization and solubilisation of nutrients and their persistence and colonization in soil was an added advantage which also enhanced the soil fertility.”
t0“Sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
Gluconacetobacter · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Gluconacetobacter · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Azospirillum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →mycorrhiza · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.