Paper · 2017 · Weed Science

Effect of Seeding Rate on Dose Response of Wild Mustard (Sinapis arvensis) to Fluthiacet-Methyl

Collen Redlick; Hema S. N. Duddu; Lena D. Syrovy; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Concern over the development of herbicide-resistant weeds has led to interest in integrated weed management systems that reduce selection pressure by utilizing mechanical and cultural weed control practices in addition to herbicides. Increasing crop seeding rate increases crop competitive ability and thus can enhance herbicide efficacy. However, it is unknown how increasing the seeding rate affects an herbicide’s efficacy. The objective of this study was to examine the interaction between increasing seeding rate and herbicide dose to control weeds. To meet this objective, the herbicide fluthiacet-methyl was applied to field-grown lentil, with Indian mustard, a proxy for wild mustard, used as a model weed. The experiment was a factorial design with four lentil seeding rates and seven herbicide rates. Overall the herbicide dose response was altered by changing lentil seeding rate. Increasing lentil seeding rate decreased the weed biomass production when herbicides were not applied. In two of the four site-years, increasing lentil seeding rate lowered the herbicide ED 50 , the dose required to result in a 50% reduction in weed biomass. Increasing the crop seeding rate altered the dose response to provide greater weed control at lower herbicide rates compared with normal crop seeding rates. Increased seeding rates also resulted in higher and more stable crop seed yields across a wider range of herbicide dosages. These results suggest that dose–response models can be used to evaluate the efficacy of other weed management practices that can interact with herbicide performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing lentil seeding rate altered the herbicide dose response.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
changing lentil seeding ratee0
Outcome
herbicide dose responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall the herbicide dose response was altered by changing lentil seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher lentil seeding rate decreased weed biomass without herbicide.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Increasing lentil seeding ratee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass productione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
when herbicides were not appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing lentil seeding rate decreased the weed biomass production when herbicides were not applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher lentil seeding rate lowered the herbicide ED 50 in two of four site-years.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
increasing lentil seeding ratee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
herbicide ED 50e0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
two of the four site-yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In two of the four site-years, increasing lentil seeding rate lowered the herbicide ED 50 , the dose required to result in a 50% reduction in weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher crop seeding rate improved weed control at lower herbicide rates versus normal seeding rate.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Increasing the crop seeding ratee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
lower herbicide ratese0
Comparator
normal crop seeding ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the crop seeding rate altered the dose response to provide greater weed control at lower herbicide rates compared with normal crop seeding rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased seeding rates yielded higher and more stable lentil seed yields over a wider herbicide-dose range.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Increased seeding ratese0
Outcome
crop seed yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
across a wider range of herbicide dosagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased seeding rates also resulted in higher and more stable crop seed yields across a wider range of herbicide dosages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–644 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using dose-response models to evaluate other weed management practices.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
dose–response models can be used to evaluate the efficacy of other weed management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that dose–response models can be used to evaluate the efficacy of other weed management practices that can interact with herbicide performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“field-grown lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–644 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

density · molecular: metabolites · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

density · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.