Paper · 2001

Sclerotinia stem rot control in small-seeded lentil production in the Black Soil Zone

Sabine Banniza; H. R. Kutcher; Albert Vandenberg

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lentil production in the black soil zone is limited by the susceptibility of the crop to diseases such as sclerotinia stem rot. The objective of this project was to determine stem rot control strategies in small-seeded lentil by examining the impact of plant density, cultivar, fungicide treatment and timing of application on stem rot severity and yield. The relationship between flower petal infection and stem rot severity was also examined. Randomized complete block field experiments of three replicates were established at Rosthern and Melfort, SK and assessed for flower petal infection, disease severity and yield in 2000. Results of this single year of data indicated that fungicides reduced stem rot severity at both locations but increased yield only at Melfort, where later timing of application resulted in greater yield than early. Stem rot severity varied with cultivar however the cultivar with the greatest severity also had the greatest yield. Plant density had no effect on stem rot severity, but the lower plant density resulted in lower yield than the higher plant density. Flower petal infection was positively correlated with final disease rating only at Rosthern.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides reduced lentil stem rot severity at both locations.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
stem rot severitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“fungicides reduced stem rot severity at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides increased lentil yield only at Melfort.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Melforte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“fungicides reduced stem rot severity at both locations but increased yield only at Melfort”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later fungicide application at Melfort produced greater lentil yield than early application.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
later timing of applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
earlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“where later timing of application resulted in greater yield than early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–844 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil stem rot severity varied by cultivar.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
cultivare0
Outcome
Stem rot severitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stem rot severity varied with cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–884 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lentil cultivar with greatest stem rot severity also had greatest yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
cultivare0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
greatest severitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“the cultivar with the greatest severity also had the greatest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density had no effect on lentil stem rot severity.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
stem rot severitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant density had no effect on stem rot severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower plant density resulted in lower lentil yield than higher density.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
lower plant densitye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
higher plant densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lower plant density resulted in lower yield than the higher plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1093 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower petal infection correlated positively with final disease rating at Rosthern only.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Organ / stage
Flower petale0
Outcome
final disease ratinge0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Setting
Rostherne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flower petal infection was positively correlated with final disease rating only at Rosthern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1186 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fungicide · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.