Abstract
Efficiency of four bioagents (i.e. Trichoderma harzianum, Gliocla-dium Wrens, Bacillus subtilis and Paecillomyces sp..) and vitavax 200 fun-gicide, were evaluated at two sowing dates as seed coating for some le-guminous crops and planted in a soil naturally infested with Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium sop. and others. The study included faba bean, lentil, and chickpea. The results of the two seasons (1999 and 2000) showed that, seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicide signifi-cantly decreased damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plants; however, the biocontrol agents were more effective than the fungicide, when compared to untreated seeds of the three legumi-nous crops, especially in the early sowings, except for lentil where the opposite trend was found. Bioagents significantly reduced damping-off and increased surviv-ing plants of faba bean and were as effective as vitavax 200. while seed coating with G.vircns or T. harzianum was more effective in controlling pre- and post- emergence damping-off on lentil in 1999 season, whereas B.subtilis was superior in 2000. On chickpea, Rhizo-N (B.subtilis) gave the best results followed by G. Wrens or 71 harzianum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatments with bioagents or Vitavax 200 reduced damping-off and increased survival in faba bean relative to untreated seed.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabae1 - Treatment
- seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicidee0
- Outcome
- damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plantse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- early sowingse0
- Comparator
- untreated seedse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicide signifi-cantly decreased damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plants; however, the biocontrol agents were more effective than the fungicide, when compared to untreated seeds of the three legumi-nous crops, especially in the early sowings, except for lentil where the opposite trend was found”
e1“The study included faba bean, lentil, and chickpea.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatments with bioagents or Vitavax 200 reduced damping-off and increased survival in lentil relative to untreated seed.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise1 - Treatment
- seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicidee0
- Outcome
- damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plantse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- early sowingse0
- Comparator
- untreated seedse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicide signifi-cantly decreased damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plants; however, the biocontrol agents were more effective than the fungicide, when compared to untreated seeds of the three legumi-nous crops, especially in the early sowings, except for lentil where the opposite trend was found”
e1“The study included faba bean, lentil, and chickpea.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatments with bioagents or Vitavax 200 reduced damping-off and increased survival in chickpea relative to untreated seed.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicidee0
- Outcome
- damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plantse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- early sowingse0
- Comparator
- untreated seedse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicide signifi-cantly decreased damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plants; however, the biocontrol agents were more effective than the fungicide, when compared to untreated seeds of the three legumi-nous crops, especially in the early sowings, except for lentil where the opposite trend was found”
e1“The study included faba bean, lentil, and chickpea.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bioagents reduced damping-off and increased surviving faba bean plants as effectively as vitavax 200.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabae0
- Treatment
- Bioagentse0
- Outcome
- damping-off and increased surviv-ing plantse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- vitavax 200e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bioagents significantly reduced damping-off and increased surviv-ing plants of faba bean and were as effective as vitavax 200.”
Claim · model-written summary
G.vircns was more effective for lentil pre- and post-emergence damping-off in 1999.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise0
- Treatment
- G.vircnse0
- Outcome
- pre- and post- emergence damping-offe0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Qualifier
- 1999 seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed coating with G.vircns or T. harzianum was more effective in controlling pre- and post- emergence damping-off on lentil in 1999 season”
Claim · model-written summary
T. harzianum was more effective for lentil pre- and post-emergence damping-off in 1999.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise0
- Treatment
- T. harzianume0
- Outcome
- pre- and post- emergence damping-offe0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Qualifier
- 1999 seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed coating with G.vircns or T. harzianum was more effective in controlling pre- and post- emergence damping-off on lentil in 1999 season”
Claim · model-written summary
B.subtilis was superior for lentil damping-off control in 2000.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise1
- Treatment
- B.subtilise0
- Outcome
- pre- and post- emergence damping-offe1
- Direction
- superiore0
- Qualifier
- 2000e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“whereas B.subtilis was superior in 2000”
e1“controlling pre- and post- emergence damping-off on lentil in 1999 season”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizo-N (B.subtilis) ranked among the best seed coatings for chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- Rhizo-N (B.subtilis)e0
- Outcome
- best resultse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On chickpea, Rhizo-N (B.subtilis) gave the best results followed by G. Wrens or 71 harzianum.”
Claim · model-written summary
G. Wrens ranked among the best seed coatings for chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- G. Wrense0
- Outcome
- best resultse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On chickpea, Rhizo-N (B.subtilis) gave the best results followed by G. Wrens or 71 harzianum.”
Claim · model-written summary
71 harzianum ranked among the best seed coatings for chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 71 harzianume0
- Outcome
- best resultse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On chickpea, Rhizo-N (B.subtilis) gave the best results followed by G. Wrens or 71 harzianum.”
The same questions in other papers
Bacillus subtilis · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →seed treatment · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fungicide · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →biocontrol · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →seed treatment · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →biocontrol · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fungicide · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.