Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed treatments with bioagents or Vitavax 200 reduced damping-off and increased survival in faba bean relative to untreated seed.

A claim from BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PRE AND POST-EMERGENCE DISEASES ON FABA BEAN, LENTIL AND CHICKPEA IN EGYPT · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments with bioagents or Vitavax 200 reduced damping-off and increased survival in faba bean relative to untreated seed.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicidee0
Outcome
damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plantse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
early sowingse0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with all bioagents or Vitavax 200 fungicide signifi-cantly decreased damping-off diseases and increased percentage of sur-viving plants; however, the biocontrol agents were more effective than the fungicide, when compared to untreated seeds of the three legumi-nous crops, especially in the early sowings, except for lentil where the opposite trend was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–803
e1

“The study included faba bean, lentil, and chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–369

Title

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PRE AND POST-EMERGENCE DISEASES ON FABA BEAN, LENTIL AND CHICKPEA IN EGYPT

NAGI M. ABOU-ZEID; MOHAMED K. ARAFA; SABAH ATTIA Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 2003. doi:10.21608/ejar.2003.287167

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-a95e34c1dea2a8e996e698d6c5d45ded9f04be3fa0f61d4c98d77504b887d960 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

fungicide · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.