Paper · 2019 · Cogent Food & Agriculture

Evaluation of endod (Phytolacca dodecandra L.) extracts against Botrytis fabae, a causative agent of chocolate spot disease of Vicia faba

Addisu Tegegn; Meseret C. Egigu; Bekele Hundie

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of botanicals to control phytopathogens of crops is an alternative to the use of synthetic fungicides. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro growth inhibitory effect of Phytolacca dodecandra extracts on Botrytis fabae and their in vivo efficacy to control chocolate spot disease of Vicia faba caused by it. Growth inhibitory effects were evaluated by applying different concentrations of aqueous, methanol or ethanol leaf extracts of P. dodecandra, or extraction solvents (control) by agar diffusion method. Disease incidence and severity were evaluated in vivo by spraying leaf extracts of P. dodecandra on V. fabae plant grown in the field soon after the detection of disease symptoms. All solvents’ extracts significantly reduced B. fabae mycelial growth compared to control, and growth reduction increased with increasing extract concentration. The aqueous extract performed better than methanol and ethanol. Results of field experiment also showed that disease incidence was reduced by at least two and three-fold when extracts and synthetic fungicides were applied, respectively. Similarly, disease severity was reduced by at least two-fold and six-fold when extracts and synthetic fungicides were applied, respectively. Application of extracts under field conditions also improved yield compared to the control. Hence, extracts of P. dodecandra are potential alternatives to synthetic fungicide to control the negative impacts of B. fabae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous, methanol and ethanol extracts reduced B. fabae mycelial growth versus control.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
extractse0
Interactor
B. fabaeBotrytis fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
B. fabae mycelial growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis fabae
Botrytis fabae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All solvents’ extracts significantly reduced B. fabae mycelial growth compared to control, and growth reduction increased with increasing extract concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth inhibition increased with extract concentration.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
extract concentratione0
Outcome
growth reductione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth reduction increased with increasing extract concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous extract performed better than methanol and ethanol extracts.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
aqueous extracte0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
methanol and ethanole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aqueous extract performed better than methanol and ethanol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

extracts reduced disease incidence by at least two-fold.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
twoe0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of field experiment also showed that disease incidence was reduced by at least two and three-fold when extracts and synthetic fungicides were applied, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

synthetic fungicides reduced disease incidence by at least three-fold.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
synthetic fungicidese0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
three-folde0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of field experiment also showed that disease incidence was reduced by at least two and three-fold when extracts and synthetic fungicides were applied, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

extracts reduced disease severity by at least two-fold.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
two-folde0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, disease severity was reduced by at least two-fold and six-fold when extracts and synthetic fungicides were applied, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

synthetic fungicides reduced disease severity by at least six-fold.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
synthetic fungicidese0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
six-folde0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, disease severity was reduced by at least two-fold and six-fold when extracts and synthetic fungicides were applied, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract application improved field yield versus control.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of extracts under field conditions also improved yield compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137 · show in text ↑

botanical · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

botanical · Botrytis fabae · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fungicide · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

botanical · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.