Intervention effectmodel-written summary

extracts reduced disease incidence by at least two-fold.

A claim from Evaluation of endod (Phytolacca dodecandra L.) extracts against Botrytis fabae, a causative agent of chocolate spot disease of Vicia faba · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

extracts reduced disease incidence by at least two-fold.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
twoe0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of field experiment also showed that disease incidence was reduced by at least two and three-fold when extracts and synthetic fungicides were applied, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1112
t0

“Vicia faba”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–137

Title

Evaluation of endod (Phytolacca dodecandra L.) extracts against Botrytis fabae, a causative agent of chocolate spot disease of Vicia faba

Addisu Tegegn; Meseret C. Egigu; Bekele Hundie Cogent Food & Agriculture 2019. doi:10.1080/23311932.2019.1686948

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-ae8ea5d67ea12bb9403b96b73a64809d728f2a25c1169fa8cc436922d125fdc8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

botanical · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.