Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar garlic extract at 5% significantly increased all yield criteria of Nubaria-1 compared with tap water.

A claim from Effect of garlic extract, ascorbic acid and nicotinamide on growth, some biochemical aspects, yield and its components of three faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivars under sandy soil conditions · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar garlic extract at 5% significantly increased all yield criteria of Nubaria-1 compared with tap water.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Material
Nubaria-1 cultivare3
Treatment
Foliar treatment of garlic extracte3
Outcome
yield criteriae3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
tap watere1
Setting
sandy soile6

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“three faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–163
e1

“foliar application of garlic extract (5%), ascorbic acid (200 ppm) and nicotinamide (50 ppm) compared with tap water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–785
e3

“Foliar treatment of garlic extract had the superiority effect in all characters of growth and yield and its components, and consequently increased significantly all yield criteria of Nubaria-1 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1356
e6

“A field experiment was conducted in sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–435

Title

Effect of garlic extract, ascorbic acid and nicotinamide on growth, some biochemical aspects, yield and its components of three faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivars under sandy soil conditions

Magda H. Mohamed; Elham A. Badr; Mervat Sh. Sadak; et al. Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center 2020. doi:10.1186/s42269-020-00359-z

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-dbbf74479eaaafaf6608d8f0ade0adbe2c31478fcd4b2d3914f61d41be41dbed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Allium sativum · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

botanical · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.