Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bioagents, inducer chemicals, and Rizolex-T reduced pathogen growth in vitro.

A claim from Management of Damping-Off and Root-Rot Diseases of Faba bean by Bioproducts and Inducer Resistance Chemicals · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagents, inducer chemicals, and Rizolex-T reduced pathogen growth in vitro.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
two bioagents as well as the two inducer resistance chemicals (IRCs) and the fungicide Rizolex-Te0
Outcome
linear growth of the tested three pathogenic fungie0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
In vitroe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro using the tested two bioagents as well as the two inducer resistance chemicals (IRCs) and the fungicide Rizolex-T, significantly reduced the linear growth of the tested three pathogenic fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–589
t0

“Faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60

Title

Management of Damping-Off and Root-Rot Diseases of Faba bean by Bioproducts and Inducer Resistance Chemicals

Sahar El-Sayed Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology 2017. doi:10.21608/ejp.2017.89733

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-17b8148b2ea862c36779c2fbf109c0ba861b0edb7b9d706e25bf9a9073392cb4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

fungicide · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.