Paper · 2013 · Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology

Improving Biocontrol of Damping-off, Root Rot and/or Wilt Diseases of Faba Bean by Salicylic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide

Montasser Abdel-Monaim

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum and Macrophomina phaseolina were found to be associated with root rot and/or wilt symptoms of faba bean plants collected from different fields in New Valley Governorate, Egypt. All the obtained isolates were able to attack faba bean plants (cv. Giza 40) causing dampingoff, root rot and wilt diseases. Pathogenicity test revealed that five isolates, i.e. two of R. solani (No. 2 and 5), one of F. solani (No. 8), one of F. oxysporum (No. 12) and one of M. phaseolina (No. 14), were the most virulent ones on faba bean plants. The bioagents Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma viride as well as the inducer chemicals salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide were examined, either individually or in combinations, for controlling damping-off, root rot and/or wilt diseases, in addition to their in vitro and in vivo effects as growth promotions on faba bean plants. All bioagents and inducer chemicals applied either individually or incombinations, inhibited the growth of the tested pathogenic fungi. Bioagents combined with inducer chemicals recorded the highest inhibition, especially in case of SA + T. viride and SA + B. megaterium. Under greenhouse and field conditions, all treatments significantly reduced damping-off, root rot and/or wilt diseases and increased the survived plants. Also, in pots experiment, tested treatments increased fresh and dry weight of the survived plants compared to the control treatment. Moreover, combinations of the tested bioagents and inducer chemicals were more effective than using each of them individually. Treatment of SA + T. viride recorded the best results in this respect. Under field conditions, all tested treatments significantly increased growth parameters (plant height and No. of branches/plant) and yield components (No. of pods and seeds/ plant, weight of 100 seeds and total yield/feddan) and protein content in both growing seasons of 2010/11 and 2011/12. Faba bean seeds soaked in SA + T. viride and SA + B. megaterium recorded the highest growth parameters and yield components. Generally, the combination between the bioagents and inducer chemicals recoded the best results for controlling damping-off, root rot and wilt diseases under the greenhouse and the field conditions, in addition to improve plant growth and increase yield components, protein content in seeds under field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum and Macrophomina phaseolina were associated with root rot and/or wilt symptoms of faba bean plants collected in New Valley Governorate, Egypt.

Taxon
faba bean plantsVicia fabae1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
associated with root rot and/or wilt symptomse1
Qualifier
Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum and Macrophomina phaseolinae1
Setting
New Valley Governorate, Egypte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani, F. oxysporum and Macrophomina phaseolina were found to be associated with root rot and/or wilt symptoms of faba bean plants collected from different fields in New Valley Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All isolates obtained were able to attack faba bean cv. Giza 40, causing damping-off, root rot and wilt diseases.

Taxon
faba bean plantsVicia fabae2
Material
cv. Giza 40e2
Interactor
obtained isolatese2pathogen
Outcome
dampingoff, root rot and wilt diseasese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“All the obtained isolates were able to attack faba bean plants (cv. Giza 40) causing dampingoff, root rot and wilt diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–350 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five isolates (two R. solani, one F. solani, one F. oxysporum and one M. phaseolina) were the most virulent on faba bean plants.

Taxon
faba bean plantsVicia fabae3
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie3pathogen
Outcome
the most virulent onese3
Qualifier
two of R. solani (No. 2 and 5), one of F. solani (No. 8), one of F. oxysporum (No. 12) and one of M. phaseolina (No. 14)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Pathogenicity test revealed that five isolates, i.e. two of R. solani (No. 2 and 5), one of F. solani (No. 8), one of F. oxysporum (No. 12) and one of M. phaseolina (No. 14), were the most virulent ones on faba bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bioagents and inducer chemicals, applied individually or in combinations, inhibited the growth of the tested pathogenic fungi in vitro.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
bioagents and inducer chemicalse4
Interactor
tested pathogenic fungie4pathogen
Outcome
the growth of the tested pathogenic fungie4
Direction
inhibitede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“All bioagents and inducer chemicals applied either individually or incombinations, inhibited the growth of the tested pathogenic fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under greenhouse and field conditions, the bioagent and inducer treatments significantly reduced damping-off, root rot and/or wilt diseases.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
bioagents Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma viride as well as the inducer chemicals salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxidee7
Outcome
damping-off, root rot and/or wilt diseasese6
Direction
reducede6
Setting
greenhouse and field conditionse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under greenhouse and field conditions, all treatments significantly reduced damping-off, root rot and/or wilt diseases and increased the survived plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1334 · show in text ↑
e7

“The bioagents Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma viride as well as the inducer chemicals salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide were examined, either individually or in combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under greenhouse and field conditions, the bioagent and inducer treatments increased the number of survived plants.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
bioagents Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma viride as well as the inducer chemicals salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxidee7
Outcome
the survived plantse6
Direction
increasede6
Setting
greenhouse and field conditionse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under greenhouse and field conditions, all treatments significantly reduced damping-off, root rot and/or wilt diseases and increased the survived plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1334 · show in text ↑
e7

“The bioagents Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma viride as well as the inducer chemicals salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide were examined, either individually or in combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pot experiments, the tested treatments increased fresh and dry weight of the survived plants compared with the control treatment.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
tested treatmentse7
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of the survived plantse7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
control treatmente7
Setting
pots experimente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e7

“Also, in pots experiment, tested treatments increased fresh and dry weight of the survived plants compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combinations of the tested bioagents and inducer chemicals were more effective than each of them used individually.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
combinations of the tested bioagents and inducer chemicalse2
Outcome
more effectivee2
Direction
more effectivee2
Comparator
using each of them individuallye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e2

“Moreover, combinations of the tested bioagents and inducer chemicals were more effective than using each of them individually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SA + T. viride treatment recorded the best results in this respect.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
SA + T. viridee3
Outcome
the best results in this respecte3
Direction
beste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“Treatment of SA + T. viride recorded the best results in this respect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under field conditions, all tested treatments significantly increased growth parameters (plant height and No. of branches/plant) in both growing seasons of 2010/11 and 2011/12.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
all tested treatmentse4
Outcome
growth parameters (plant height and No. of branches/plant)e4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
in both growing seasons of 2010/11 and 2011/12e4
Setting
Under field conditionse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under field conditions, all tested treatments significantly increased growth parameters (plant height and No. of branches/plant) and yield components (No. of pods and seeds/ plant, weight of 100 seeds and total yield/feddan) and protein content in both growing seasons of 2010/11 and 2011/12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under field conditions, all tested treatments significantly increased yield components.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
all tested treatmentse4
Outcome
yield componentse4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
Under field conditionse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under field conditions, all tested treatments significantly increased growth parameters (plant height and No. of branches/plant) and yield components (No. of pods and seeds/ plant, weight of 100 seeds and total yield/feddan) and protein content in both growing seasons of 2010/11 and 2011/12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under field conditions, all tested treatments significantly increased protein content.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
all tested treatmentse4
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
Under field conditionse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under field conditions, all tested treatments significantly increased growth parameters (plant height and No. of branches/plant) and yield components (No. of pods and seeds/ plant, weight of 100 seeds and total yield/feddan) and protein content in both growing seasons of 2010/11 and 2011/12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean seeds soaked in SA + T. viride or SA + B. megaterium recorded the highest growth parameters and yield components.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
seeds soaked in SA + T. viride and SA + B. megateriume5
Outcome
growth parameters and yield componentse5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“Faba bean seeds soaked in SA + T. viride and SA + B. megaterium recorded the highest growth parameters and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of bioagents and inducer chemicals recorded the best results for controlling damping-off, root rot and wilt diseases under greenhouse and field conditions.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
the combination between the bioagents and inducer chemicalse6
Outcome
controlling damping-off, root rot and wilt diseasese6
Direction
best resultse6
Setting
under the greenhouse and the field conditionse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“Generally, the combination between the bioagents and inducer chemicals recoded the best results for controlling damping-off, root rot and wilt diseases under the greenhouse and the field conditions, in addition to improve plant growth and increase yield components, protein content in seeds under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2085–2398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagents combined with inducer chemicals recorded the highest inhibition of the tested fungi in vitro, especially SA + T. viride and SA + B. megaterium.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Bioagents combined with inducer chemicalse5
Outcome
inhibitione5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“Bioagents combined with inducer chemicals recorded the highest inhibition, especially in case of SA + T. viride and SA + B. megaterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1180 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Trichoderma viride · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma viride · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Priestia megaterium · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Priestia megaterium · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

biocontrol · survival · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.