Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Exogenous SA reduced the severity of phosphorus deficiency.

A claim from Monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) and salicylic acid (SA) as seed priming in Vicia faba L. and Vicia sativa L. · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous SA reduced the severity of phosphorus deficiency.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. and Vicia sativa L.Vicia fabaVicia sativat0
Treatment
exogenous application of SAe0
Outcome
severity effect of P deficiencye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed priming or the exogenous application of SA significantly reduced the severity effect of P deficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1388
t0

“Vicia faba L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–109

Title

Monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) and salicylic acid (SA) as seed priming in Vicia faba L. and Vicia sativa L.

Wissal M'Sehli; Nadia Kallala; Karima Jaleli; et al. Bioscience Journal 2020. doi:10.14393/bj-v36n6a2020-51267

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e77e33c4984ba03e7ba7e9b52081255cb33c428082558c1fbd6218a524e1144e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

salicylic acid · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.