Abstract
Faba bean damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kühn and Fusarium solaniMart are considered the most destructive diseases. All tested pathogenic fungal isolates of F. solaniand R. solani that have been collected from various locations at nine governorates were clearly variedin their virulence onto faba bean plants (cv. Giza-429) under greenhouse conditions. F. solani El-Nubaria (Fs4) and R. solani El-Menia (R20) were the most virulent isolates. To evaluate the geneticdiversity of the most aggressive isolates of R. solani and F. solani (9 isolates for each one), wereinvestigated using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique. The most effectiveantagonistic bacterial and fungal isolates were identified by testing the ability of these isolates toutilize different carbon sources and amino acids using Biolog-System Technique. All tested bioagents(Trichodema hamatum-2, T. harzianum, Bacillus subtilis-1 and B. mylotquefaciens-1), culture filtrates,biocides (Bio-Arc and Bio-Zeid) and chemical fungicides (Rizolex-T, Vitavax-200 and Moncut)significantly reduced the percentages of damping-off and increased the percentage of survived plantcompared with control. The most effective treatments for reducing these diseases were obtained byapplying fungicides followed by both of active bioagents and biocides. Meanwhile, culture filtratesof bioagents were the least effective treatments. Rizolex-T and Moncut were the most effectivefungicides against F. solani and R. solani.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
F. solani isolates varied in virulence on faba bean plants.
- Taxon
- faba bean plants
Vicia fabae0 - Material
- Giza-429e0
- Interactor
- F. solaniande0pathogen
- Outcome
- virulence onto faba bean plantse0
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All tested pathogenic fungal isolates of F. solaniand R. solani that have been collected from various locations at nine governorates were clearly variedin their virulence onto faba bean plants (cv. Giza-429) under greenhouse conditions.”
Claim · model-written summary
R. solani isolates varied in virulence on faba bean plants.
- Taxon
- faba bean plantsVicia fabae0
- Material
- Giza-429e0
- Interactor
- R. solani
Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen - Outcome
- virulence onto faba bean plantse0
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All tested pathogenic fungal isolates of F. solaniand R. solani that have been collected from various locations at nine governorates were clearly variedin their virulence onto faba bean plants (cv. Giza-429) under greenhouse conditions.”
Claim · model-written summary
F. solani El-Nubaria (Fs4) was the most virulent F. solani isolate.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Interactor
- F. solani El-Nubaria (Fs4)
_Sacc._5393379.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium solanie0pathogen - Outcome
- most virulent isolatese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Sacc._5393379.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“F. solani El-Nubaria (Fs4) and R. solani El-Menia (R20) were the most virulent isolates.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
R. solani El-Menia (R20) was the most virulent R. solani isolate.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Interactor
- R. solani El-Menia (R20)Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- most virulent isolatese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“F. solani El-Nubaria (Fs4) and R. solani El-Menia (R20) were the most virulent isolates.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Tested bioagents, filtrates, biocides, and fungicides significantly reduced damping-off.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- bioagentse0
- Outcome
- percentages of damping-offe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All tested bioagents(Trichodema hamatum-2, T. harzianum, Bacillus subtilis-1 and B. mylotquefaciens-1), culture filtrates,biocides (Bio-Arc and Bio-Zeid) and chemical fungicides (Rizolex-T, Vitavax-200 and Moncut)significantly reduced the percentages of damping-off and increased the percentage of survived plantcompared with control.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Tested bioagents, filtrates, biocides, and fungicides significantly increased plant survival.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- bioagentse0
- Outcome
- percentage of survived plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All tested bioagents(Trichodema hamatum-2, T. harzianum, Bacillus subtilis-1 and B. mylotquefaciens-1), culture filtrates,biocides (Bio-Arc and Bio-Zeid) and chemical fungicides (Rizolex-T, Vitavax-200 and Moncut)significantly reduced the percentages of damping-off and increased the percentage of survived plantcompared with control.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicides were the most effective treatment for reducing damping-off.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- fungicidese0
- Outcome
- reducing these diseasese0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most effective treatments for reducing these diseases were obtained byapplying fungicides followed by both of active bioagents and biocides.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Active bioagents and biocides ranked after fungicides for reducing damping-off.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- active bioagents and biocidese0
- Outcome
- reducing these diseasese0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most effective treatments for reducing these diseases were obtained byapplying fungicides followed by both of active bioagents and biocides.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Bioagent culture filtrates were least effective against damping-off.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- culture filtratesof bioagentse0
- Outcome
- least effective treatmentse0
- Direction
- least effectivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“culture filtratesof bioagents were the least effective treatments.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Rizolex-T was among the most effective fungicides against F. solani.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- Rizolex-Te0
- Interactor
- F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- most effectivefungicides against F. solanie0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rizolex-T and Moncut were the most effectivefungicides against F. solani and R. solani.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Moncut was among the most effective fungicides against R. solani.
- Taxon
- FABA BEANVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- Moncute0
- Interactor
- R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- most effectivefungicides against F. solani and R. solanie0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rizolex-T and Moncut were the most effectivefungicides against F. solani and R. solani.”
t0“FABA BEAN”
The same questions in other papers
biocontrol · survival · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
biocontrol · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.