Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Compost co-addition with P. megaterium and Azolla extract under half phosphorus dose had superior yield and yield components relative to full dose.

A claim from Performance of Priestia megaterium, Azolla Extract and Compost as P-activators for the cultivation of Faba Bean in Calcareous Soil · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost co-addition with P. megaterium and Azolla extract under half phosphorus dose had superior yield and yield components relative to full dose.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
compost coaddition with P. megaterium and Azolla extract under half dose of phosphorus fertilizere3
Interactor
P. megateriumPriestia megateriume3symbiont
Outcome
yield and yield componentse3
Direction
superioritye3
Qualifier
relatively emulatee3
Comparator
full dosee3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–111
e3

“At post-harvest, esti-mated overall performance indicated variable enhancements for yield and yield components in response to P-activators with superiority of compost coaddition with P. megaterium and Azolla extract under half dose of phosphorus fertilizer to relatively emulate that attained by full dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1398

Title

Performance of Priestia megaterium, Azolla Extract and Compost as P-activators for the cultivation of Faba Bean in Calcareous Soil

Yasser El-Tahlawy; Soad El-Sayed; Hend El-Egami Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 2022. doi:10.21608/ejss.2022.157189.1527

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-ceb85abe8c2ca6edde9edbd5f61a904a8b624fc0051db0e05ffeaf129dbc8a06 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Azolla · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Priestia megaterium · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.