Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Residual N5 gave higher yield attributes and seed and stover yields.

A claim from Effect of Different Levels of Fertilizer and Residual Effect of INM on Yields and Economic of Broad bean under Black Aromatic Rice-Broad bean Cropping Sequence · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual N5 gave higher yield attributes and seed and stover yields.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
100% RDF + Azolla + Azospirillum + Neem powder (N5)e0
Outcome
yield attributes, seed and stover yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual effect of 100% RDF + Azolla + Azospirillum + Neem powder (N5) applied to previous kharif rice crop recorded significantly higher yield attributes, seed and stover yields and economic of broad bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1100

Title

Effect of Different Levels of Fertilizer and Residual Effect of INM on Yields and Economic of Broad bean under Black Aromatic Rice-Broad bean Cropping Sequence

Thoudam Anupama Devi; Edwin Luikham; L. Nabachandra Singh; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2025. doi:10.18805/lr-5434

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-2cf494929ee522c8b484c742dbc237e9c001f59d56915286ab01343bb5e162b3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Azolla · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

botanical · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.