Paper · 2003 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Response of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) to Plant Density, Sowing Date, Phosphorus Fertilization and Ethephon Application in the Absence of Moisture Stress

M. A. Turk; A. M. Tawaha; M. K. J. El‐Shatnawi

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
81
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Lentil ( Lenus culinaris Medik) is a major grain legume crop in many developing countries in West Asia, North Africa and many other areas of the world. The effects of sowing date (1 January, 15 January and 2 February), plant density (80, 100 and 120 plants m −2 ), phosphorus level (0, 17.5, 35.0 and 52.5 kg P ha −1 ) and ethephon application [(1500 p.p.m. ethephon (2‐chloroethel phosphonic acid) applied 30 days after sowing] were investigated in the semiarid region in the north of Jordan. High yields were obtained for early sowing (1 January), high plant density (120 plants m −2 ), and high phosphorus application rate (52.5 kg P ha −1 ). Yield and yield components were not affected by ethephon application 30 days after sowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing (1 January) gave high lentil yields in a semiarid region of northern Jordan.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
early sowing (1 January)e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Setting
semiarid region in the north of Jordane2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“High yields were obtained for early sowing (1 January)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“were investigated in the semiarid region in the north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High plant density (120 plants m-2) gave high lentil yields.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
high plant density (120 plants m −2 )e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
120 plants m −2e1
Setting
semiarid region in the north of Jordane2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“High yields were obtained for early sowing (1 January), high plant density (120 plants m −2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–596 · show in text ↑
e2

“were investigated in the semiarid region in the north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High phosphorus application rate (52.5 kg P ha-1) gave high lentil yields.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
high phosphorus application rate (52.5 kg P ha −1 )e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
52.5 kg P ha −1e1
Setting
semiarid region in the north of Jordane2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“High yields were obtained for early sowing (1 January), high plant density (120 plants m −2 ), and high phosphorus application rate (52.5 kg P ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–653 · show in text ↑
e2

“were investigated in the semiarid region in the north of Jordan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon application 30 days after sowing did not affect lentil yield or yield components.

Taxon
Lens culinarisLens culinarist0
Treatment
ethephon application 30 days after sowinge1
Outcome
Yield and yield componentse1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield and yield components were not affected by ethephon application 30 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–744 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sowing time · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.