Paper · 2016 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Heat Stress at Reproductive Stage Disrupts Leaf Carbohydrate Metabolism, Impairs Reproductive Function, and Severely Reduces Seed Yield in Lentil

Kalpna Bhandari; Kadambot H. M. Siddique; Neil C. Turner; et al.

14
claims
38
verbatim quotes
105
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rising temperatures or global warming will be detrimental for various crops. Moreover, because of increasing demand for lentil (Lens culinaris L.) grains, there is a need to broaden the adaptation of this crop into warmer climes. Hence, a study was conducted to evaluate the effects of high temperatures (>32/20oC) during reproductive growth on performance of lentil and to probe the mechanisms associated with reproductive failures. Three lentil genotypes, viz., LL699, LL931, and LL1122, were grown in pots at two sowing dates: (1) the normal sowing time (NS) in November so that day/night temperatures during the reproductive stage were below 32/20°C; and (2) late-sown (LS) in February so that temperatures during the reproductive stage were above 32/20°C. The plants were fully irrigated during both the sowing situations. In LS plants, the phenology was accelerated, leading to substantial reduction in biomass, flowers, and pods, accompanied by marked shortening of flowering period and podding duration, causing decreased seed yield. At the peak flowering stage (average temp. >32/23oC), the leaves of the LS plants had significantly lower relative leaf water content and lower stomatal conductance than NS plants at the same stage, indicating that the late sowing induced both water stress and heat stress. In LS plants, reproductive function was markedly reduced in all genotypes, causing increased pod abortion. The leaves of LS plants showed increased damage to membranes, chlorosis, decreased photochemical efficiency, with an associated reduction in sucrose synthesis and increase in its hydrolysis, compared with the NS plants. Heat stress, in combination with intermittent water stress during the reproductive phase in the LS plants, was extremely detrimental for all three lentil genotypes, with only minor differences among them. Controlled-environment studies, where the plants were subjected to high temperatures (33/15°C, 35/20°C) during reproductive growth, also validated the detrimental effects of heat stress on studied traits, similar to outdoor conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing accelerated lentil phenology.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
late-sown (LS) in Februarye3
Outcome
phenologye0
Direction
acceleratede0
Comparator
normal sowing time (NS) in Novembere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In LS plants, the phenology was accelerated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“normal sowing time (NS) in November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–573 · show in text ↑
e3

“late-sown (LS) in February”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing substantially reduced lentil biomass, flowers and pods.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise2
Treatment
LS plantse1
Outcome
biomass, flowers, and podse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
normal sowing time (NS) in Novembere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantial reduction in biomass, flowers, and pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“In LS plants, the phenology was accelerated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–871 · show in text ↑
e2

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“normal sowing time (NS) in November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing shortened lentil flowering and podding duration.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise2
Treatment
LS plantse1
Outcome
flowering period and podding duratione0
Direction
shorteninge0
Comparator
normal sowing time (NS) in Novembere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marked shortening of flowering period and podding duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“In LS plants, the phenology was accelerated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–871 · show in text ↑
e2

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“normal sowing time (NS) in November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing decreased lentil seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise2
Treatment
LS plantse1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
normal sowing time (NS) in Novembere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“causing decreased seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“In LS plants, the phenology was accelerated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–871 · show in text ↑
e2

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“normal sowing time (NS) in November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At peak flowering, late-sown plants had significantly lower relative leaf water content.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Organ / stage
peak flowering stagee0
Treatment
LS plantse0
Outcome
relative leaf water contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
NS plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the peak flowering stage (average temp. >32/23oC), the leaves of the LS plants had significantly lower relative leaf water content and lower stomatal conductance than NS plants at the same stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At peak flowering, late-sown plants had lower stomatal conductance.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Organ / stage
peak flowering stagee0
Treatment
LS plantse0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
NS plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the peak flowering stage (average temp. >32/23oC), the leaves of the LS plants had significantly lower relative leaf water content and lower stomatal conductance than NS plants at the same stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing reduced reproductive function in all genotypes.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
LS plantse0
Outcome
reproductive functione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
normal sowing time (NS) in Novembere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In LS plants, reproductive function was markedly reduced in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1389 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“normal sowing time (NS) in November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowing increased pod abortion.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise2
Treatment
LS plantse1
Outcome
pod abortione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal sowing time (NS) in Novembere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“causing increased pod abortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1421 · show in text ↑
e1

“In LS plants, reproductive function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1351 · show in text ↑
e2

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“normal sowing time (NS) in November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-sown leaves showed increased membrane damage and chlorosis.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
LS plantse0
Outcome
damage to membranes, chlorosise0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NS plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaves of LS plants showed increased damage to membranes, chlorosis, decreased photochemical efficiency, with an associated reduction in sucrose synthesis and increase in its hydrolysis, compared with the NS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1641 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-sown leaves had decreased photochemical efficiency.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
LS plantse0
Outcome
photochemical efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
NS plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaves of LS plants showed increased damage to membranes, chlorosis, decreased photochemical efficiency, with an associated reduction in sucrose synthesis and increase in its hydrolysis, compared with the NS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1641 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-sown leaves had reduced sucrose synthesis.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
LS plantse0
Outcome
sucrose synthesise0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
NS plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaves of LS plants showed increased damage to membranes, chlorosis, decreased photochemical efficiency, with an associated reduction in sucrose synthesis and increase in its hydrolysis, compared with the NS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1641 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-sown leaves had increased sucrose hydrolysis.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
LS plantse0
Outcome
its hydrolysise0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
NS plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaves of LS plants showed increased damage to membranes, chlorosis, decreased photochemical efficiency, with an associated reduction in sucrose synthesis and increase in its hydrolysis, compared with the NS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1641 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat and intermittent water stress during reproduction were detrimental for all three lentil genotypes, with minor differences among them.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
extremely detrimental for all three lentil genotypese0
Qualifier
with only minor differences among theme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat stress, in combination with intermittent water stress during the reproductive phase in the LS plants, was extremely detrimental for all three lentil genotypes, with only minor differences among them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-environment heat exposure validated detrimental effects on the studied traits.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
high temperatures (33/15°C, 35/20°C)e0
Outcome
detrimental effects of heat stress on studied traitse0
Comparator
outdoor conditionse0
Setting
Controlled-environment studiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Controlled-environment studies, where the plants were subjected to high temperatures (33/15°C, 35/20°C) during reproductive growth, also validated the detrimental effects of heat stress on studied traits, similar to outdoor conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–2082 · show in text ↑
e1

“lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–146 · show in text ↑

sowing time · physiology: water · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · physiology: photosynthesis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 24 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

sowing time · physiology: gas exchange · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.